These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23519005)

  • 1. Using confidence-based marking in a laboratory setting: A tool for student self-assessment and learning.
    Barr DA; Burke JR
    J Chiropr Educ; 2013; 27(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 23519005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Reliability and Medical Students' Appreciation of Certainty-Based Marking.
    Smrkolj Š; Bančov E; Smrkolj V
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Certainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course - A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning.
    Luetsch K; Burrows J
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):267. PubMed ID: 27741945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of English Language on Multiple Choice Question Scores of Thai Medical Students.
    Phisalprapa P; Muangkaew W; Assanasen J; Kunavisarut T; Thongngarm T; Ruchutrakool T; Kobwanthanakun S; Dejsomritrutai W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Apr; 99(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 27396231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Negatively-marked MCQ assessments that reward partial knowledge do not introduce gender bias yet increase student performance and satisfaction and reduce anxiety.
    Bond AE; Bodger O; Skibinski DO; Jones DH; Restall CJ; Dudley E; van Keulen G
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e55956. PubMed ID: 23437081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a Web-based question database for students' self-assessment.
    Hammoud MM; Barclay ML
    Acad Med; 2002 Sep; 77(9):925. PubMed ID: 12228094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of certainty-based marking in a second-year medical student cohort: a pilot study.
    Schoendorfer N; Emmett D
    Adv Med Educ Pract; 2012; 3():139-43. PubMed ID: 23762012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Collaborative testing enhances student learning.
    Rao SP; Collins HL; DiCarlo SE
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2002 Dec; 26(1-4):37-41. PubMed ID: 11850326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Student engagement using multiple-attempt 'Weekly Participation Task' quizzes with undergraduate nursing students.
    Hughes M; Salamonson Y; Metcalfe L
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2020 Jul; 46():102803. PubMed ID: 32526682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Description of a change in teaching methods and comparison of quizzes versus midterms scores in a research methods course.
    Sullivan SGB; Hoiriis KT; Paolucci L
    J Chiropr Educ; 2018 Oct; 32(2):84-89. PubMed ID: 29873246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Online feedback assessments in physiology: effects on students' learning experiences and outcomes.
    Marden NY; Ulman LG; Wilson FS; Velan GM
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Jun; 37(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 23728137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Articulating scientific reasoning improves student learning in an undergraduate anatomy and physiology course.
    Krontiris-Litowitz J
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2009; 8(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 19952099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can medical students accurately predict their learning? A study comparing perceived and actual performance in neuroanatomy.
    Hall SR; Stephens JR; Seaby EG; Andrade MG; Lowry AF; Parton WJ; Smith CF; Border S
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 27037749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical student web-based formative assessment tool for renal pathology.
    Bijol V; Byrne-Dugan CJ; Hoenig MP
    Med Educ Online; 2015; 20():26765. PubMed ID: 25833824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Student generation and peer review of examination questions in the dental curriculum: Enhancing student engagement and learning.
    Nguyen KA; Lucas C; Leadbeatter D
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2020 Aug; 24(3):548-558. PubMed ID: 32347592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing a script concordance examination to a multiple-choice examination on a core internal medicine clerkship.
    Kelly W; Durning S; Denton G
    Teach Learn Med; 2012; 24(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 22775780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.
    Walsh JL; Harris BHL; Denny P; Smith P
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Feb; 94(1108):97-103. PubMed ID: 28866607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact and educational outcomes of a small group self-directed teaching strategy in a clinical neuroscience curriculum.
    Nathaniel TI; Gainey JC; Williams JA; Stewart BL; Hood MC; Brechtel LE; Faulkner RV; Pendergrass JS; Black LA; Griffin SK; Troup CE; Reuben JS; Black AC
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Sep; 11(5):478-487. PubMed ID: 29251834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.