BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

4944 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23519008)

  • 21. Respiratory-gated imaging in metabolic evaluation of small solitary pulmonary nodules: 18F-FDG PET/CT and correlation with histology.
    Farid K; Poullias X; Alifano M; Regnard JF; Servois V; Caillat-Vigneron N; Petras S
    Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Jul; 36(7):722-7. PubMed ID: 25793929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging vs. FDG-PET for the detection of non-small-cell lung cancer. How do they measure up?
    Chen W; Jian W; Li HT; Li C; Zhang YK; Xie B; Zhou DQ; Dai YM; Lin Y; Lu M; Huang XQ; Xu CX; Chen L
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 28(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 20418042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detection of bone metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients: comparison of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), whole-body MR imaging without and with DWI, whole-body FDG-PET/CT, and bone scintigraphy.
    Takenaka D; Ohno Y; Matsumoto K; Aoyama N; Onishi Y; Koyama H; Nogami M; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Sugimura K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Aug; 30(2):298-308. PubMed ID: 19629984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Simultaneous [18F]FDG-PET/MRI: Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) in Primary and Recurrent Cervical Cancer.
    Brandmaier P; Purz S; Bremicker K; Höckel M; Barthel H; Kluge R; Kahn T; Sabri O; Stumpp P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141684. PubMed ID: 26551527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of Positron Emission Tomography Quantification Using Magnetic Resonance- and Computed Tomography-Based Attenuation Correction in Physiological Tissues and Lesions: A Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Study in 66 Patients.
    Seith F; Gatidis S; Schmidt H; Bezrukov I; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer N
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Jan; 51(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26348596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficients measured by 3T diffusion-weighted MRI and SUV from FDG PET/CT in primary cervical cancer.
    Ho KC; Lin G; Wang JJ; Lai CH; Chang CJ; Yen TC
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2009 Feb; 36(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 18779960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Correlation between functional imaging markers derived from diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal cancer.
    Goense L; Heethuis SE; van Rossum PSN; Voncken FEM; Lagendijk JJW; Lam MGEH; Terhaard CH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP; Mook S; van Lier ALHMW; Lin SH; Meijer GJ
    Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jan; 39(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 29023336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Increasing the accuracy of volume and ADC delineation for heterogeneous tumor on diffusion-weighted MRI: correlation with PET/CT.
    Gong NJ; Wong CS; Chu YC; Guo H; Huang B; Chan Q
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):407-13. PubMed ID: 23958150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correlation between glycolytic activity on [18F]-FDG-PET and cell density on diffusion-weighted MRI in lymphoma at staging.
    Giraudo C; Karanikas G; Weber M; Raderer M; Jaeger U; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1217-1226. PubMed ID: 29086453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging of lymphoma nodal target lesions: Comparison of PET standardized uptake value (SUV) with MR apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).
    Bernstine H; Domachevsky L; Nidam M; Goldberg N; Abadi-Korek I; Shpilberg O; Groshar D
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Apr; 97(16):e0490. PubMed ID: 29668631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET) assessment of metabolism with ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG), proliferation with ¹⁸F-fluoro-thymidine (FLT), and hypoxia with ¹⁸fluoro-misonidazole (F-miso) before and during radiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a pilot study.
    Vera P; Bohn P; Edet-Sanson A; Salles A; Hapdey S; Gardin I; Ménard JF; Modzelewski R; Thiberville L; Dubray B
    Radiother Oncol; 2011 Jan; 98(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 21056487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of FDG PET/MRI and FDG PET/CT in Pediatric Oncology in Terms of Anatomic Correlation of FDG-positive Lesions.
    Uslu-Beşli L; Atay Kapucu LÖ; Karadeniz C; Akdemir ÜÖ; Pinarli FG; Aydos U; Okur A; Kaya Z; Samanci C; Karabacak NI
    J Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 41(7):542-550. PubMed ID: 30933019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diffusion-Weighted MRI for the Initial Viability Evaluation of Parasites in Hepatic Alveolar Echinococcosis: Comparison with Positron Emission Tomography.
    Zheng J; Wang J; Zhao J; Meng X
    Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 29353998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR and FDG-PET/CT in Hodgkin Lymphoma: Predictive role before treatment and early assessment after two courses of ABVD.
    Albano D; Patti C; Matranga D; Lagalla R; Midiri M; Galia M
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jun; 103():90-98. PubMed ID: 29803392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative Performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Detection and Characterization of Pulmonary Lesions in 121 Oncologic Patients.
    Sawicki LM; Grueneisen J; Buchbender C; Schaarschmidt BM; Gomez B; Ruhlmann V; Wetter A; Umutlu L; Antoch G; Heusch P
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Apr; 57(4):582-6. PubMed ID: 26742715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of 3T diffusion-weighted MRI and
    Lee SY; Jee WH; Yoo IR; Jung JY; Im SA; Chung YG; Kang JH
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 92(1102):20181051. PubMed ID: 31322913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. FDG-PET and diffusion-weighted MRI in head-and-neck cancer patients: implications for dose painting.
    Houweling AC; Wolf AL; Vogel WV; Hamming-Vrieze O; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C; van de Kamer JB; van der Heide UA
    Radiother Oncol; 2013 Feb; 106(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 23395065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hybrid FDG-PET/MR compared to FDG-PET/CT in adult lymphoma patients.
    Atkinson W; Catana C; Abramson JS; Arabasz G; McDermott S; Catalano O; Muse V; Blake MA; Barnes J; Shelly M; Hochberg E; Rosen BR; Guimaraes AR
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jul; 41(7):1338-48. PubMed ID: 27315095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of 18F-fluoride PET/MR and PET/CT in patients with foot pain of unclear cause.
    Rauscher I; Beer AJ; Schaeffeler C; Souvatzoglou M; Crönlein M; Kirchhoff C; Sandmann G; Fürst S; Kilger R; Herz M; Ziegler S; Schwaiger M; Eiber M
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Mar; 56(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 25678485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multiparametric analysis of bone marrow in cancer patients using simultaneous PET/MR imaging: Correlation of fat fraction, diffusivity, metabolic activity, and anthropometric data.
    Schraml C; Schmid M; Gatidis S; Schmidt H; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Schwenzer NF
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(4):1048-56. PubMed ID: 25683203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 248.