These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23520199)

  • 1. Estimation of organ and effective doses from newborn radiography of the chest and abdomen.
    Ma H; Elbakri IA; Reed M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 23520199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of dose-area product-to-effective dose conversion factors for neonatal radiography using PCXMC.
    Elbakri IA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Jan; 158(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 23896417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of various approaches for assessing dose indicators and patient organ doses resulting from radiotherapy cone-beam CT.
    Rampado O; Giglioli FR; Rossetti V; Fiandra C; Ragona R; Ropolo R
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2515. PubMed ID: 27147362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation exposure to premature infants in a neonatal intensive care unit in Turkey.
    Olgar T; Onal E; Bor D; Okumus N; Atalay Y; Turkyilmaz C; Ergenekon E; Koc E
    Korean J Radiol; 2008; 9(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 18838850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital phantom versus patient-specific radiation dosimetry in adult routine thorax CT examinations.
    Papadakis AE; Giannakaki V; Stratakis J; Myronakis M; Zaidi H; Damilakis J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jul; 25(7):e14389. PubMed ID: 38778565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of dosimetry methods for panoramic radiography: thermoluminescent dosimeter measurement versus personal computer-based Monte Carlo method calculation.
    Lee C; Lee SS; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Mar; 121(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 26795453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation risk assessment in neonatal radiographic examinations of the chest and abdomen: a clinical and Monte Carlo dosimetry study.
    Makri T; Yakoumakis E; Papadopoulou D; Gialousis G; Theodoropoulos V; Sandilos P; Georgiou E
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):5023-33. PubMed ID: 16985285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 6: conversion factors for reconstruction of organ dose in abdominal radiography].
    Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2009 Oct; 181(10):945-61. PubMed ID: 19517339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The additional dose to radiosensitive organs caused by using under-collimated X-ray beams in neonatal intensive care radiography.
    Datz H; Ben-Shlomo A; Bader D; Sadetzki S; Juster-Reicher A; Marks K; Smolkin T; Zangen S; Margaliot M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(4):518-24. PubMed ID: 18375467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ORGAN DOSES ASSESSMENT FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING CONVENTIONAL X-RAY EXAMINATIONS: PHANTOM EXPERIMENTS VS. CALCULATIONS.
    Golikov V; Barkovsky A; Wallstrom E; Cederblad Å
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Jan; 178(2):223-234. PubMed ID: 28981902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Verification of organ doses calculated by a dose monitoring software tool based on Monte Carlo Simulation in thoracic CT protocols.
    Guberina N; Suntharalingam S; Naßenstein K; Forsting M; Theysohn J; Wetter A; Ringelstein A
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):322-326. PubMed ID: 28618854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparisons of point and average organ dose within an anthropomorphic physical phantom and a computational model of the newborn patient.
    Sessions JB; Roshau JN; Tressler MA; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bouchet LG; Bolch WE
    Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1080-9. PubMed ID: 12094977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 3: Conversion coefficients for reconstruction of organ doses achieved during chest X-ray examinations].
    Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1061-81. PubMed ID: 19235700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetry of MammoSite® applicator: comparison between Monte Carlo simulation, measurements, and treatment planning calculation.
    Oshaghi M; Sadeghi M; Mahdavi SR; Shirazi A
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 23771363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Organ and effective doses in newborn patients during helical multislice computed tomography examination.
    Staton RJ; Lee C; Lee C; Williams MD; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5151-66. PubMed ID: 17019030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 7: conversion factors for reconstruction of organ dose during thoracoabdominal babygrams].
    Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2010 May; 182(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 19953431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ASSESSMENT OF PCXMC MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS IN SLOT-SCANNING-BASED EXAMINATIONS: COMPARISON WITH IN-PHANTOM THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY.
    Piai A; Loria A; Tiberio P; Magnino S; Campoleoni M; Sconfienza LM; Del Vecchio A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2023 Mar; 199(3):ncac273 277 289-234. PubMed ID: 36583519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FEASIBILITY STUDY OF USING PCXMC 2.0 TO ESTIMATE PATIENT DOSE ARISING FROM DEXA SCANS.
    Harmer H; Radford S; Smail M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Nov; 181(4):418-422. PubMed ID: 29566224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control.
    Brisse HJ; Robilliard M; Savignoni A; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
    Health Phys; 2009 Oct; 97(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 19741359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental evaluation of PCXMC and prepare codes used in conventional radiology.
    Khelassi-Toutaoui N; Berkani Y; Tsapaki V; Toutaoui AE; Merad A; Frahi-Amroun A; Brahimi Z
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):374-8. PubMed ID: 18586862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.