273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23521857)
1. The ethics of open access publishing.
Parker M
BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Mar; 14():16. PubMed ID: 23521857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethics of open access to biomedical research: just a special case of ethics of open access to research.
Harnad S
Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2007 Dec; 2():31. PubMed ID: 18067660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unethical Aspects of Open Access.
Shaw DM; Elger BS
Account Res; 2018; 25(7-8):409-416. PubMed ID: 30362378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Open access publishing in the biomedical sciences: could funding agencies accelerate the inevitable changes?
Glover SW; Webb A; Gleghorn C
Health Info Libr J; 2006 Sep; 23(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 16911126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Open access as a requirement for research ethics committee approval.
Rogers W
BMJ; 2015 Oct; 351():h5299. PubMed ID: 26467941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A single, open access journal may prevent the primary publishing problems in the life sciences.
Lewis P; Depp C
Account Res; 2019 Aug; 26(6):391-396. PubMed ID: 30763518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Data transparency - an ethical imperative? Approaching the issues].
Marckmann G; Strech D
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 21530911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open to the public: paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing.
Day S; Rennie S; Luo D; Tucker JD
Res Involv Engagem; 2020; 6():8. PubMed ID: 32161664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Commentary: open access, open business, closed fairness!
Moustafa K
Account Res; 2015; 22(4):246-8. PubMed ID: 25897769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Common law morality.
Arras JD
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):35-7. PubMed ID: 11655998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Towards a new equitable system of scientific publications].
Vizcaíno-Salazar G
Invest Clin; 2009 Jun; 50(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 19662809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Open access to research data: the two sides of the coin.
De Hert S; Samama CM
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Jan; 34(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 27898480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Predatory publishing or a lack of peer review transparency?-a contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in paediatric urology.
O'Kelly F; Fernandez N; Koyle MA
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Apr; 15(2):159.e1-159.e7. PubMed ID: 30867116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Open by default: a proposed copyright license and waiver agreement for open access research and data in peer-reviewed journals.
Hrynaszkiewicz I; Cockerill MJ
BMC Res Notes; 2012 Sep; 5():494. PubMed ID: 22958225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predatory publishing: Take care that you are not caught in the Open Access net.
Stone TE; Rossiter RC
Nurs Health Sci; 2015 Sep; 17(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 26224548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing.
Davis PM
FASEB J; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2129-34. PubMed ID: 21450907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "FakeBooks"--predatory journals: The dark side of publishing.
Natarajan S; Nair AG
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 64(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 27050342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Merchants of mayhem.
Nelson B
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 May; 124(5):301-2. PubMed ID: 27176736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The highly profitable but unethical business of publishing medical research.
Smith R
J R Soc Med; 2006 Sep; 99(9):452-6. PubMed ID: 16946388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific Integrity: Challenges in the Electronic Era.
Berquist TH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):1. PubMed ID: 29267029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
