545 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23521889)
1. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.
Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure.
Sakamoto M; Kanamori A; Fujihara M; Yamada Y; Nakamura M; Negi A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 92(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 23586927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.
Kato Y; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Handa M; Tabuchi H; Kiuchi Y
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):687-696. PubMed ID: 28393323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Salim S; Du H; Wan J
J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Pakrou N; Gray T; Mills R; Landers J; Craig J
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18303384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer.
Jablonski KS; Rosentreter A; Gaki S; Lappas A; Dietlein TS
J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Icare ic100 Rebound Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in 1,000 Eyes.
Subramaniam AG; Allen P; Toh T
Ophthalmic Res; 2021; 64(2):321-326. PubMed ID: 32906125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements between Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer and Tono-Pen XL Tonometer in Supine and Lateral Decubitus Body Positions.
Lee TE; Yoo C; Hwang JY; Lin S; Kim YY
Curr Eye Res; 2015 Sep; 40(9):923-9. PubMed ID: 25271991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a New Rebound Self-tonometer, Icare HOME: Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
Takagi D; Sawada A; Yamamoto T
J Glaucoma; 2017 Jul; 26(7):613-618. PubMed ID: 28369004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparability of Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometer in a Wide Range of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness.
Tamçelik N; Atalay E; Cicik E; Özkök A
Ophthalmic Res; 2015; 54(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 26022193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison between Goldmann, Icare Pro and Corvis ST tonometry].
Bañeros-Rojas P; Martinez de la Casa JM; Arribas-Pardo P; Berrozpe-Villabona C; Toro-Utrera P; García-Feijoó J
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2014 Jul; 89(7):260-4. PubMed ID: 24814401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Icare-Pro Rebound Tonometer Versus Hand-held Applanation Tonometer for Pediatric Screening.
Arribas-Pardo P; Mendez-Hernández C; Valls-Ferran I; Puertas-Bordallo D
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2018 Nov; 55(6):382-386. PubMed ID: 30074606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
Nakakura S; Mori E; Fujio Y; Fujisawa Y; Matsuya K; Kobayashi Y; Tabuchi H; Asaoka R; Kiuchi Y
J Glaucoma; 2019 Feb; 28(2):172-177. PubMed ID: 30689609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of measurement of intraocular pressure by ICARE PRO® tonometer and Goldman applanation tonometer].
Hladíková E; Pluháček F; Marešová K
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2014 Jun; 70(3):90-3. PubMed ID: 25032793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Icare rebound tonometry in children with known and suspected glaucoma.
Flemmons MS; Hsiao YC; Dzau J; Asrani S; Jones S; Freedman SF
J AAPOS; 2011 Apr; 15(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 21419676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L
J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 16778643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
