These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23522549)

  • 21. Comparison of apical extrusion of NaOCl using the EndoVac or needle irrigation of root canals.
    Mitchell RP; Yang SE; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):338-41. PubMed ID: 20113804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three-dimensional numeric simulation of root canal irrigant flow with different irrigation needles.
    Shen Y; Gao Y; Qian W; Ruse ND; Zhou X; Wu H; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):884-9. PubMed ID: 20416439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation.
    van der Sluis LW; Gambarini G; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 16674742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dynamic recording of irrigating fluid distribution in root canals using thermal image analysis.
    Hsieh YD; Gau CH; Kung Wu SF; Shen EC; Hsu PW; Fu E
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jan; 40(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 17209827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ex vivo assessment of irrigant penetration and renewal during the final irrigation regimen.
    Bronnec F; Bouillaguet S; Machtou P
    Int Endod J; 2010 Aug; 43(8):663-72. PubMed ID: 20491986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris.
    Curtis TO; Sedgley CM
    J Endod; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1261-4. PubMed ID: 22892747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of the effect of various irrigants on apically extruded debris after root canal preparation.
    Parirokh M; Jalali S; Haghdoost AA; Abbott PV
    J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 22244635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems.
    Hinrichs RE; Walker WA; Schindler WG
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9641140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques.
    Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Er K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 18230395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Apical Extrusion of Debris and Irrigants Using Different Irrigation Needles.
    Silva PB; Krolow AM; Pilownic KJ; Casarin RP; Lima RK; Leonardo Rde T; Pappen FG
    Braz Dent J; 2016; 27(2):192-5. PubMed ID: 27058383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An in vitro study of apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite during endodontic canal preparation.
    Brown DC; Moore BK; Brown CE; Newton CW
    J Endod; 1995 Dec; 21(12):587-91. PubMed ID: 8596077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In-vitro measurement of apically extruded irrigant in primary molars.
    Williams CE; Reid JS; Sharkey SW; Saunders WP
    Int Endod J; 1995 Jul; 28(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 8595945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of root canal taper on the irrigant flow: evaluation using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model.
    Boutsioukis C; Gogos C; Verhaagen B; Versluis M; Kastrinakis E; Van der Sluis LW
    Int Endod J; 2010 Oct; 43(10):909-16. PubMed ID: 20618877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of apical preparation size and preparation taper on irrigant volume delivered by using negative pressure irrigation system.
    Brunson M; Heilborn C; Johnson DJ; Cohenca N
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):721-4. PubMed ID: 20307751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Irrigation of human prepared root canal--ex vivo based computational fluid dynamics analysis.
    Snjaric D; Carija Z; Braut A; Halaji A; Kovacevic M; Kuis D
    Croat Med J; 2012 Oct; 53(5):470-9. PubMed ID: 23100209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal using various flow rates: a Computational Fluid Dynamics study.
    Boutsioukis C; Lambrianidis T; Kastrinakis E
    Int Endod J; 2009 Feb; 42(2):144-55. PubMed ID: 19134043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative effects of erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser, the shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming, and the conventional needle irrigation on apical extrusion of irrigants.
    Vatanpour M; Fazlyab M; Nikzad M
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Sep; 39():102878. PubMed ID: 35470126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Syringe Irrigation in Minimally Shaped Root Canals Using 3 Endodontic Needles: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.
    Boutsioukis C; Gutierrez Nova P
    J Endod; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1487-1495. PubMed ID: 34118256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measurement of pressure and flow rates during irrigation of a root canal ex vivo with three endodontic needles.
    Boutsioukis C; Lambrianidis T; Kastrinakis E; Bekiaroglou P
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):504-13. PubMed ID: 17326784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Root canal debris removal using different irrigating needles: an SEM study.
    Ghivari S; Kubasad G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 22406709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.