These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23522649)

  • 1. Influence of anatomical location on CT numbers in cone beam computed tomography.
    Oliveira ML; Tosoni GM; Lindsey DH; Mendoza K; Tetradis S; Mallya SM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Apr; 115(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 23522649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of 3D reconstructions based on cone beam computed tomography.
    Maret D; Molinier F; Braga J; Peters OA; Telmon N; Treil J; Inglèse JM; Cossié A; Kahn JL; Sixou M
    J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1465-9. PubMed ID: 20929716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of surrounding conditions on pixel value of cone beam computed tomography.
    Araki K; Okano T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):862-5. PubMed ID: 22092375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of exposure factors on the variability of CBCT voxel values: a phantom study.
    Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ; Ambrosano GM; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20140128. PubMed ID: 24869906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 64-Detector-Multislice and Cone Beam Computed Tomographies in the Evaluation of Linear Measurements in the Alveolar Ridge.
    Pena de Andrade JG; Valerio CS; de Oliveira Monteiro MA; de Carvalho Machado V; Manzi FR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 26929949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the accuracy of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography reconstructions by using different voxel sizes.
    Maret D; Peters OA; Galibourg A; Dumoncel J; Esclassan R; Kahn JL; Sixou M; Telmon N
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25146011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The validity of cone-beam computed tomography in measuring root canal length using a gold standard.
    Liang YH; Jiang L; Chen C; Gao XJ; Wesselink PR; Wu MK; Shemesh H
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1607-10. PubMed ID: 24238457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy.
    Michetti J; Maret D; Mallet JP; Diemer F
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1187-90. PubMed ID: 20630296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study.
    Bagis N; Kolsuz ME; Kursun S; Orhan K
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 May; 15():64. PubMed ID: 26016804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of CT numbers in limited and medium field-of-view scans taken using Accuitomo 170 and Veraviewepocs 3De cone-beam computed tomography scanners.
    Oliveira ML; Tosoni GM; Lindsey DH; Mendoza K; Tetradis S; Mallya SM
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2014 Dec; 44(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 25473635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of cone-beam computed tomographic scan mode for detection of horizontal root fracture.
    Costa FF; Pinheiro LR; Umetsubo OS; dos Santos O; Gaia BF; Cavalcanti MG
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1472-6. PubMed ID: 25146036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of various anatomic patterns of root canals in mandibular incisors using digital periapical radiography, 3 cone-beam computed tomographic scanners, and micro-computed tomographic imaging.
    Paes da Silva Ramos Fernandes LM; Rice D; Ordinola-Zapata R; Alvares Capelozza AL; Bramante CM; Jaramillo D; Christensen H
    J Endod; 2014 Jan; 40(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 24331989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
    Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reducing cone beam CT scan height as a method of radiation reduction for photorealistic three-dimensional orthognathic planning.
    Lin CY; Hsung TC; Khambay B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 43(6):907-12. PubMed ID: 25976036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of field-of-view and patient size on CT numbers from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Seet KY; Barghi A; Yartsev S; Van Dyk J
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6251-62. PubMed ID: 19794246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans in comparison with periapical radiographs for root canal length measurement: an in situ study.
    Metska ME; Liem VM; Parsa A; Koolstra JH; Wesselink PR; Ozok AR
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1206-9. PubMed ID: 25069934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of cone beam CT device and field of view for the detection of simulated periapical bone lesions.
    Hedesiu M; Baciut M; Baciut G; Nackaerts O; Jacobs R;
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Oct; 41(7):548-52. PubMed ID: 22554990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of object location on the density measurement and Hounsfield conversion in a NewTom 3G cone beam computed tomography unit.
    Lagravère MO; Carey J; Ben-Zvi M; Packota GV; Major PW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Sep; 37(6):305-8. PubMed ID: 18757714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.