204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23522760)
1. Differences in accuracy and underestimation rates for 14- versus 16-gauge core needle biopsies in ultrasound-detectable breast lesions.
Lai HW; Wu HK; Kuo SJ; Chen ST; Tseng HS; Tseng LM; Chen DR
Asian J Surg; 2013 Apr; 36(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 23522760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of CT-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsies: 14-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Needles.
Ocak S; Duplaquet F; Jamart J; Pirard L; Weynand B; Delos M; Eucher P; Rondelet B; Dupont M; Delaunois L; Sibille Y; Dahlqvist C
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 May; 27(5):674-81. PubMed ID: 27017121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Needle Size in Ultrasound-guided Core Needle Breast Biopsy: Comparison of 14-, 16-, and 18-Gauge Needles.
Giuliani M; Rinaldi P; Rella R; Fabrizi G; Petta F; Carlino G; Di Leone A; Mulè A; Bufi E; Romani M; Belli P; Bonomo L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Nov; 17(7):536-543. PubMed ID: 28342776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the accuracy of US-guided biopsy of breast masses performed with 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge automated cutting needle biopsy devices, and review of the literature.
Huang ML; Hess K; Candelaria RP; Eghtedari M; Adrada BE; Sneige N; Fornage BD
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2928-2933. PubMed ID: 27844099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions.
Crystal P; Koretz M; Shcharynsky S; Makarov V; Strano S
J Clin Ultrasound; 2005 Feb; 33(2):47-52. PubMed ID: 15674836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions].
Fan ZQ; Ouyang T; Wang TF; Li JF; Xie YT; Fan T; Zhang Z; Lin BY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 45(17):1185-7. PubMed ID: 18067713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of underestimation of malignancy after image-guided core needle biopsy diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia or atypical ductal hyperplasia.
Yu CC; Ueng SH; Cheung YC; Shen SC; Kuo WL; Tsai HP; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast J; 2015; 21(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 25772033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases.
Schueller G; Jaromi S; Ponhold L; Fuchsjaeger M; Memarsadeghi M; Rudas M; Weber M; Liberman L; Helbich TH
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):406-13. PubMed ID: 18641246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Diagnostic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy With 18- Versus 20-Gauge Needles for Thyroid Nodules.
Ahn HS; Seo M; Ha SM; Kim HS
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Nov; 37(11):2565-2574. PubMed ID: 29575135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Borderline breast lesions: comparison of malignancy underestimation rates with 14-gauge core needle biopsy versus 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device.
Londero V; Zuiani C; Linda A; Battigelli L; Brondani G; Bazzocchi M
Eur Radiol; 2011 Jun; 21(6):1200-6. PubMed ID: 21225267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of needle biopsy of breast lesions visible on ultrasound: audit of fine needle versus core needle biopsy in 3233 consecutive samplings with ascertained outcomes.
Brancato B; Crocetti E; Bianchi S; Catarzi S; Risso GG; Bulgaresi P; Piscioli F; Scialpi M; Ciatto S; Houssami N
Breast; 2012 Aug; 21(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 22088803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lesion stiffness measured by shear-wave elastography: Preoperative predictor of the histologic underestimation of US-guided core needle breast biopsy.
Park AY; Son EJ; Kim JA; Han K; Youk JH
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2509-14. PubMed ID: 26467705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Impact of needle size and sonographic feature on accuracy of ultrasound-guided breast biopsy].
Zhou J; Tang J; Luo Y; Wang Z; Lv F; Zhang M; Fu S; Xu Q
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2014 Jan; 34(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 24463114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value.
Vimpeli SM; Saarenmaa I; Huhtala H; Soimakallio S
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):863-9. PubMed ID: 18618302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Axillary lymph node biopsy in newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer: comparative accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy versus core-needle biopsy.
Rautiainen S; Masarwah A; Sudah M; Sutela A; Pelkonen O; Joukainen S; Sironen R; Kärjä V; Vanninen R
Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 23771915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: the Florence experience of over 4000 consecutive biopsies.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bianchi S; Bonardi R; Brancato B; Catarzi S; Risso GG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Mar; 101(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16823506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the clinical and pathological characteristics of ultrasound-guided biopsy for breast masses and non-mass lesions between 16-gauge spring-loaded core needle biopsy and 12-gauge spring-loaded vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Yashima Y; Fujioka T; Kubota K; Mori M; Sato A; Oda G; Nakagawa T; Onishi I; Tanaka M; Tateishi U
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2023 Apr; 50(2):205-212. PubMed ID: 36645627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with upstaging from ductal carcinoma in situ following core needle biopsy to invasive cancer in subsequent surgical excision.
Kim J; Han W; Lee JW; You JM; Shin HC; Ahn SK; Moon HG; Cho N; Moon WK; Park IA; Noh DY
Breast; 2012 Oct; 21(5):641-5. PubMed ID: 22749854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy for breast lesions.
Wiratkapun C; Treesit T; Wibulpolprasert B; Lertsithichai P
Singapore Med J; 2012 Jan; 53(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 22252182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is core needle biopsy effective at diagnosing male breast lesions?
Yang Y; Li S; Liu G; Shao Z
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Sep; 177(2):507-511. PubMed ID: 31168757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
