These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence. Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center. Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens. Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of pure versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon. Park B; Kim W; Jeong BC; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY; Seo SI Scand J Urol; 2013 Feb; 47(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 22835035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biochemical recurrence-free survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Ritch CR; You C; May AT; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Penson DF; Chang SS; Cookson MS; Smith JA; Barocas DA Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1309-15. PubMed ID: 24746665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy. Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience. Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of patients at risk for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with intra-operative frozen section. Tully KH; Schulmeyer M; Hanske J; Reike MJ; Brock M; Moritz R; Jütte H; Tannapfel A; von Bodman C; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ; Roghmann F BJU Int; 2021 Nov; 128(5):598-606. PubMed ID: 33961328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of biochemical recurrence after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Analysis of 359 cases with a median follow-up period of 26 months. Abdel Raheem A; Chang KD; Alenzi MJ; Ham WS; Han WK; Choi YD; Rha KH Int J Urol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1006-1014. PubMed ID: 30276864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biochemical recurrence rates are similar for pT2-positive surgical margins and pT3a. Leite KR; Hartmann C; Reis ST; Viana N; Dall'Oglio MF; Sant'Anna AC; Nesrallah A; Nesrallah L; Antunes AA; Camara-Lopes LH; Srougi M Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 24856481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer. Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients. Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Variations in Prostatic Apex Shape on Apical Margin Positive Rate After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy vs Open Radical Prostatectomy. Yu YD; Lee M; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee S J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 29212368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The presence of benign prostatic glandular tissue at surgical margins does not predict PSA recurrence. Kernek KM; Koch MO; Daggy JK; Juliar BE; Cheng L J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jul; 58(7):725-8. PubMed ID: 15976340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Serum prostate-specific antigen value adjusted for non-cancerous prostate tissue volume in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a new predictor of biochemical recurrence in localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. Ku JH; Moon KC; Cho SY; Kwak C; Kim HH Asian J Androl; 2011 Mar; 13(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 21102474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]