These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23523940)

  • 1. Stimulus dependence in probabilistic category learning.
    Kemény F; Lukács A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 May; 143(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 23523940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of newly trained verbal and nonverbal labels for the cues in probabilistic category learning.
    Fotiadis FA; Protopapas A
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jan; 42(1):112-25. PubMed ID: 23868697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are two cues always better than one? The role of multiple intra-sensory cues compared to multi-cross-sensory cues in children's incidental category learning.
    Broadbent H; Osborne T; Mareschal D; Kirkham N
    Cognition; 2020 Jun; 199():104202. PubMed ID: 32087397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of retrieval practice and presentation modality on verbal learning: testing the limits of the testing effect.
    Wilkinson AM; Hall ACG; Hogan EE
    Memory; 2019 Sep; 27(8):1144-1157. PubMed ID: 31234716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linguistic entrenchment: Prior knowledge impacts statistical learning performance.
    Siegelman N; Bogaerts L; Elazar A; Arciuli J; Frost R
    Cognition; 2018 Aug; 177():198-213. PubMed ID: 29705523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of modality presentation on working memory in school-age children: evidence for the pictorial superiority hypothesis.
    Constantinidou F; Danos MA; Nelson D; Baker S
    Child Neuropsychol; 2011; 17(2):173-96. PubMed ID: 21271411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-insight in probabilistic category learning.
    Kemény F; Lukács Á
    J Gen Psychol; 2013; 140(1):57-81. PubMed ID: 24837346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thalamic and parietal brain morphology predicts auditory category learning.
    Scharinger M; Henry MJ; Erb J; Meyer L; Obleser J
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():75-83. PubMed ID: 24035788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus modality and working memory performance in Greek children with reading disabilities: additional evidence for the pictorial superiority hypothesis.
    Constantinidou F; Evripidou C
    Child Neuropsychol; 2012; 18(3):256-80. PubMed ID: 21942734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repetition priming for multisensory stimuli: task-irrelevant and task-relevant stimuli are associated if semantically related but with no advantage over uni-sensory stimuli.
    Hecht D; Reiner M; Karni A
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():236-44. PubMed ID: 19022232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Visual Advantage Effect in Comparing Uni-Modal and Cross-Modal Probabilistic Category Learning.
    Sun X; Fu Q
    J Intell; 2023 Nov; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 38132836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time-dependent changes in learning audiovisual associations: a single-trial fMRI study.
    Gonzalo D; Shallice T; Dolan R
    Neuroimage; 2000 Mar; 11(3):243-55. PubMed ID: 10694466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of task modality and stimulus frequency in paced serial addition tests on functional brain activity.
    Gielen J; Wiels W; Van Schependom J; Laton J; Van Hecke W; Parizel PM; D'hooghe MB; Nagels G
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194388. PubMed ID: 29543871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hebb repetition effects in visual memory: the roles of verbal rehearsal and distinctiveness.
    Horton N; Hay DC; Smyth MM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008; 61(12):1769-77. PubMed ID: 18609390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Domain-general sequence learning deficit in specific language impairment.
    Lukács A; Kemény F
    Neuropsychology; 2014 May; 28(3):472-83. PubMed ID: 24588702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cerebellar tDCS does not improve performance in probabilistic classification learning.
    Seyed Majidi N; Verhage MC; Donchin O; Holland P; Frens MA; van der Geest JN
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Feb; 235(2):421-428. PubMed ID: 27766351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Timing is everything: changes in presentation rate have opposite effects on auditory and visual implicit statistical learning.
    Emberson LL; Conway CM; Christiansen MH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1021-40. PubMed ID: 21347988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neurophysiological evidence for the interplay of speech segmentation and word-referent mapping during novel word learning.
    François C; Cunillera T; Garcia E; Laine M; Rodriguez-Fornells A
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Apr; 98():56-67. PubMed ID: 27732869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.