These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23523940)

  • 21. On the relationship between learning strategy and feedback processing in the weather prediction task--Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Rustemeier M; Schwabe L; Bellebaum C
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 23347964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tracking Multiple Statistics: Simultaneous Learning of Object Names and Categories in English and Mandarin Speakers.
    Chen CH; Gershkoff-Stowe L; Wu CY; Cheung H; Yu C
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Aug; 41(6):1485-1509. PubMed ID: 27671780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Auditory working memory predicts individual differences in absolute pitch learning.
    Van Hedger SC; Heald SL; Koch R; Nusbaum HC
    Cognition; 2015 Jul; 140():95-110. PubMed ID: 25909580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of cue modality and emotional category on recognition of nonverbal emotional signals in schizophrenia.
    Vogel BD; Brück C; Jacob H; Eberle M; Wildgruber D
    BMC Psychiatry; 2016 Jul; 16():218. PubMed ID: 27388011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Superiority of visual (verbal) vs. auditory test presentation modality in a P300-based CIT: The Complex Trial Protocol for concealed autobiographical memory detection.
    Deng X; Rosenfeld JP; Ward A; Labkovsky E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():26-34. PubMed ID: 27140728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of presentation modality upon learning in a comprehension task using oral, manual, and dual mode stimulus cues.
    Karlan GR; Lloyd LL; Fristoe M
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):436-43. PubMed ID: 6645469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
    Pierce BH; Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differential effect of visual masking in perceptual categorization.
    Hélie S; Cousineau D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):816-25. PubMed ID: 25867507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of auditory and visual modalities in recall of words.
    Gadzella BM; Whitehead DA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Feb; 40(1):255-6. PubMed ID: 1118270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. People, clothing, music, and arousal as contextual retrieval cues in verbal memory.
    Standing LG; Bobbitt KE; Boisvert KL; Dayholos KN; Gagnon AM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Oct; 107(2):523-34. PubMed ID: 19093614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Error discounting in probabilistic category learning.
    Craig S; Lewandowsky S; Little DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):673-87. PubMed ID: 21355666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves probabilistic category learning.
    Cho SS; Yoon EJ; Lee JM; Kim SE
    Brain Topogr; 2012 Oct; 25(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 22842936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Better learning with more error: probabilistic feedback increases sensitivity to correlated cues in categorization.
    Little DR; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1041-61. PubMed ID: 19586269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Enhancement from targets and suppression from cues in fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning.
    Leclercq V; Seitz AR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Sep; 141(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 22842471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modality and task switching interactions using bi-modal and bivalent stimuli.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 23524240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli.
    Hecht D; Reiner M
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 193(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 18985327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How do people solve the "weather prediction" task?: individual variability in strategies for probabilistic category learning.
    Gluck MA; Shohamy D; Myers C
    Learn Mem; 2002; 9(6):408-18. PubMed ID: 12464701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of association strength and cross-modal correspondence on the development of multimodal stimuli.
    Chan ZP; Dyson BJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):560-70. PubMed ID: 25391886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The attentional boost effect with verbal materials.
    Mulligan NW; Spataro P; Picklesimer M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1049-1063. PubMed ID: 24611436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Enumeration produces poor primacy for tactile presentation relative to visual and auditory presentation as the only modality effect.
    Gibbons JA; Velkey AJ; Partin KT
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Jun; 106(3):795-810. PubMed ID: 18712201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.