485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23524201)
1. To sling or not to sling at time of abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Richardson ML; Elliott CS; Shaw JG; Comiter CV; Chen B; Sokol ER
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1306-12. PubMed ID: 23524201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A retrospective analysis comparing colposuspension and retropubic mid-urethral sling as preventive anti-incontinence measures during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy].
Palomba S; Oppedisano R; Materazzo C; Albano A; Condorelli M; Dicello A; Napolitano V; Zullo F
Minerva Ginecol; 2011 Apr; 63(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 21508905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abdominal sacral colpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ohno MS; Richardson ML; Sokol ER
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Feb; 27(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 26282093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic retropubic sling at the time of vaginal prolapse surgery.
Mou T; Cadish LA; Gray EL; Bretschneider CE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 227(3):471.e1-471.e7. PubMed ID: 35644248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT.
Abdel-Fattah M; Cooper D; Davidson T; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Bhal K; McDonald A; Wardle J; N'Dow J; MacLennan G; Norrie J
Health Technol Assess; 2022 Dec; 26(47):1-190. PubMed ID: 36520097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-Utility Analysis of Midurethral Sling Timing Among Women Undergoing Prolapse Surgery.
Sassani JC; Giugale LE; Lavelle ES; Shepherd JP
Urogynecology (Phila); 2024 Jan; 30(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 37493280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Managing the urethra at transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair: a urodynamic approach.
Ballert KN; Biggs GY; Isenalumhe A; Rosenblum N; Nitti VW
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):679-84. PubMed ID: 19091337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Impact of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, with or without a midurethral sling, on lower urinary tract symptoms].
Salerno J; de Tayrac R; Droupy S; Costa P; Llinares E; Fatton B; Wagner L
Prog Urol; 2016 Jun; 26(7):401-8. PubMed ID: 27068055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost utility analysis of urethral bulking agents versus midurethral sling in stress urinary incontinence.
Kunkle CM; Hallock JL; Hu X; Blomquist J; Thung SF; Werner EF
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(3):154-9. PubMed ID: 25730435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective management of the urethra at time of pelvic organ prolapse repair: an assessment of postoperative incontinence and patient satisfaction.
Chermansky CJ; Krlin RM; Winters JC
J Urol; 2012 Jun; 187(6):2144-8. PubMed ID: 22503013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cost-effectiveness analysis of conservative versus surgical management for the initial treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
Richardson ML; Sokol ER
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):565.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25019485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the surgical treatment of female urinary incontinence using slings and meshes.
Montesino-Semper MF; Jimenez-Calvo JM; Cabases JM; Sanchez-Iriso E; Hualde-Alfaro A; García-García D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Nov; 171(1):180-6. PubMed ID: 24035322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Use of a Vaginal Pessary to Decide Whether a Mid Urethral Sling should be Added to Prolapse Surgery.
Goessens E; Deriemaeker H; Cammu H
J Urol; 2020 Mar; 203(3):598-603. PubMed ID: 31584852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with or without midurethral sling insertion: Is a two- step approach justified? A prospective study.
Christmann-Schmid C; Bruehlmann E; Koerting I; Krebs J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Oct; 229():98-102. PubMed ID: 30144729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mid-urethral sling in the management of women with stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse treatment.
Wang PH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Dec; 57(6):777-778. PubMed ID: 30545526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of the availability of midurethral slings on treatment strategies for stress urinary incontinence: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Chang OH; Cadish LA; Kailasam A; Ridgeway BM; Shepherd JP
BJOG; 2022 Feb; 129(3):500-508. PubMed ID: 34314554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimum 1.5-year results of "surgeon-tailored" transvaginal mesh repair for female stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.
Önol FF; Tosun F; Güzel R; Boylu U; Küçük EV; Gümüş E
Urology; 2012 Aug; 80(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 22857745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of Prophylactic Mid-Urethral Sling at the Time of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
Stewart CA; Popat S; Zhao H; Dallas K; Gonzalez G; Gonzales-Alabastro C; Ackerman AL; Eilber K; Anger JT
Urology; 2021 Apr; 150():130-133. PubMed ID: 32683067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation.
Brazzelli M; Javanbakht M; Imamura M; Hudson J; Moloney E; Becker F; Wallace S; Omar MI; Shimonovich M; MacLennan G; Ternent L; Vale L; Montgomery I; Mackie P; Saraswat L; Monga A; Craig D
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Mar; 23(14):1-306. PubMed ID: 30929658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vaginal prolapse repair with or without a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence: a randomized trial.
van der Ploeg JM; Oude Rengerink K; van der Steen A; van Leeuwen JH; van der Vaart CH; Roovers JP;
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jul; 27(7):1029-38. PubMed ID: 26740197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
