These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23524623)

  • 21. Unfairness sensitivity and social decision-making in individuals with alcohol dependence: a preliminary study.
    Brevers D; Noël X; Ermer E; Dabiri D; Verbanck P; Kornreich C
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Dec; 133(2):772-5. PubMed ID: 24021763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mentalizing in economic decision-making.
    Polezzi D; Daum I; Rubaltelli E; Lotto L; Civai C; Sartori G; Rumiati R
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 190(2):218-23. PubMed ID: 18406476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are irrational reactions to unfairness truly emotionally-driven? Dissociated behavioural and emotional responses in the Ultimatum Game task.
    Civai C; Corradi-Dell'Acqua C; Gamer M; Rumiati RI
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 19786275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the impact of sexual cues on men's decisions in ultimatum games.
    Van den Bergh B; Dewitte S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Aug; 273(1597):2091-5. PubMed ID: 16846918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gut feelings and the reaction to perceived inequity: the interplay between bodily responses, regulation, and perception shapes the rejection of unfair offers on the ultimatum game.
    Dunn BD; Evans D; Makarova D; White J; Clark L
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 12(3):419-29. PubMed ID: 22618636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
    van 't Wout M; Kahn RS; Sanfey AG; Aleman A
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(4):564-8. PubMed ID: 16489438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of self-esteem on social interactions during the Ultimatum Game.
    Paz V; Nicolaisen-Sobesky E; Collado E; Horta S; Rey C; Rivero M; Berriolo P; Díaz M; Otón M; Pérez A; Fernández-Theoduloz G; Cabana Á; Gradin VB
    Psychiatry Res; 2017 Jun; 252():247-255. PubMed ID: 28285253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Neural substrates underlying the tendency to accept anger-infused ultimatum offers during dynamic social interactions.
    Gilam G; Lin T; Raz G; Azrielant S; Fruchter E; Ariely D; Hendler T
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():400-11. PubMed ID: 26166623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Ultimatum Game and the brain: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.
    Gabay AS; Radua J; Kempton MJ; Mehta MA
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2014 Nov; 47():549-58. PubMed ID: 25454357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stress-induced changes in LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine production in chronic fatigue syndrome.
    Gaab J; Rohleder N; Heitz V; Engert V; Schad T; Schürmeyer TH; Ehlert U
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2005 Feb; 30(2):188-98. PubMed ID: 15471616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The neural correlate of mid-value offers in ultimatum game.
    Zhong X; Wang R; Huang S; Chen J; Chen H; Qu C
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220622. PubMed ID: 31430295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lateral OFC activity predicts decision bias due to first impressions during ultimatum games.
    Kim H; Choi MJ; Jang IJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Feb; 24(2):428-39. PubMed ID: 21942764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harlé KM; Sanfey AG
    Emotion; 2007 Nov; 7(4):876-81. PubMed ID: 18039057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.
    Ma Q; Hu Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rejection in Bargaining Situations: An Event-Related Potential Study in Adolescents and Adults.
    Zanolie K; de Cremer D; Güroğlu B; Crone EA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139953. PubMed ID: 26445134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dissociation between medial frontal negativity and cardiac responses in the ultimatum game: Effects of offer size and fairness.
    Van der Veen FM; Sahibdin PP
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 11(4):516-25. PubMed ID: 21786030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Power to Punish Norm Violations Affects the Neural Processes of Fairness-Related Decision Making.
    Cheng X; Zheng L; Li L; Guo X; Wang Q; Lord A; Hu Z; Yang G
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():344. PubMed ID: 26696858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.