These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23524804)
21. Titanium surface topography after brushing with fluoride and fluoride-free toothpaste simulating 10 years of use. Fais LM; Fernandes-Filho RB; Pereira-da-Silva MA; Vaz LG; Adabo GL J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):265-75. PubMed ID: 22265989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of brushing with conventional versus whitening dentifrices on surface roughness and biofilm formation of dental ceramics. Azevedo SM; Kantorski KZ; Valandro LF; Bottino MA; Pavanelli CA Gen Dent; 2012; 60(3):e123-30. PubMed ID: 22623466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods. Vigolo P; Motterle M J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20416411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Implant surface alterations from a nonmetallic ultrasonic tip. Bailey GM; Gardner JS; Day MH; Kovanda BJ J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr; 1998; 46(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 10597152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations. Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Morgese F; Squillace A Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The adhesion of oral bacteria to modified titanium surfaces: role of plasma proteins and electrostatic forces. Badihi Hauslich L; Sela MN; Steinberg D; Rosen G; Kohavi D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():49-56. PubMed ID: 22150723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study. Solís Moreno C; Santos A; Nart J; Levi P; Velásquez A; Sanz Moliner J J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Use of confocal microscopy for quantification of plastic remnants on rough titanium after instrumentation and evaluation of efficacy of removal. Yang SM; Park JB; Ko Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 26009902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Treatment of titanium dental implants with three piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers: an in vivo study. Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Yagi H; Matsumoto K; Ito K J Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 78(9):1689-94. PubMed ID: 17760537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Early dental plaque formation on toothbrushed titanium implant surfaces. Amarante ES; Chambrone L; Lotufo RF; Lima LA Am J Dent; 2008 Oct; 21(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 19024258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Efficacy of a solar-powered TiO2 semiconductor electric toothbrush on P. gingivalis biofilm. Sato T; Hirai N; Oishi Y; Uswak G; Komiyama K; Hamada N Am J Dent; 2015 Apr; 28(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 26087572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of five mechanical instrumentation protocols on implant surface topography and roughness: A scanning electron microscope and confocal laser scanning microscope analysis. Cha JK; Paeng K; Jung UW; Choi SH; Sanz M; Sanz-Martín I Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jun; 30(6):578-587. PubMed ID: 31022305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of an Er:YAG laser and the Vector ultrasonic system on the biocompatibility of titanium implants in cultures of human osteoblast-like cells. Schwarz F; Rothamel D; Sculean A; Georg T; Scherbaum W; Becker J Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Dec; 14(6):784-92. PubMed ID: 15015956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of 10 cleaning instruments on four different implant surfaces. Schmage P; Thielemann J; Nergiz I; Scorziello TM; Pfeiffer P Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 22442769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of tip wear of piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers on root surface roughness at different working parameters. A profilometric and atomic force microscopy study. Arabaci T; Cicek Y; Dilsiz A; Erdogan İY; Kose O; Kizildağ A Int J Dent Hyg; 2013 Feb; 11(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23033943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of different treatment approaches on the removal of early plaque biofilms and the viability of SAOS2 osteoblasts grown on titanium implants. Schwarz F; Sculean A; Romanos G; Herten M; Horn N; Scherbaum W; Becker J Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Jun; 9(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 15841403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments. Duarte PM; Reis AF; de Freitas PM; Ota-Tsuzuki C J Periodontol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1824-32. PubMed ID: 19905952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects of mechanical instruments on contaminated titanium dental implant surfaces: a systematic review. Louropoulou A; Slot DE; Van der Weijden F Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Oct; 25(10):1149-60. PubMed ID: 23834327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical evaluation of the effects of a sonic toothbrush with ultrasound waveguide in disrupting plaque with and without bristle contact. Biesbrock AR; He T; Walters PA; Bartizek RD Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 18578173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]