These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23524804)
41. Experimental models for contamination of titanium surfaces and disinfection protocols. Sousa V; Mardas N; Spratt D; Boniface D; Dard M; Donos N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1233-1242. PubMed ID: 26864128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cleaning and modification of intraorally contaminated titanium discs with calcium phosphate powder abrasive treatment. Tastepe CS; Liu Y; Visscher CM; Wismeijer D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1238-46. PubMed ID: 22882522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The maintenance of inserted titanium implants: in-vitro evaluation of exposed surfaces cleaned with three different instruments. Bertoldi C; Lusuardi D; Battarra F; Sassatelli P; Spinato S; Zaffe D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jan; 28(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 26744027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effect of toothbrushing on titanium surface: an approach to understanding surface properties of brushed titanium. Hossain A; Okawa S; Miyakawa O Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 16054208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Probing and scaling instrumentation on implant abutment surfaces: an in vitro study. Fakhravar B; Khocht A; Jefferies SR; Suzuki JB Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 22814556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effects of toothbrushing with fluoride abrasive and whitening dentifrices on both unbleached and bleached human enamel surface in terms of roughness and hardness: an in vitro study. Bolay S; Cakir FY; Gurgan S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 23250157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Titanium surface modification and its effect on the adherence of Porphyromonas gingivalis: an in vitro study. Amoroso PF; Adams RJ; Waters MG; Williams DW Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Dec; 17(6):633-7. PubMed ID: 17092220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The effects of diode and Er:YAG laser applications on the surface topography of titanium grade 4 and titanium zirconium discs with sand-blasted and acid-etched (SLA) surfaces. Öztürk A; Tosun E; Meral SE; Baştan FE; Üstel F; Kan B; Avcu E J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 125(3):101680. PubMed ID: 37951501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparing biocompatibility of gingival fibroblasts and bacterial strains on a different modified titanium discs. Franková J; Pivodová V; Růžička F; Tománková K; Šafářová K; Vrbková J; Ulrichová J J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Oct; 101(10):2915-24. PubMed ID: 23529774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Ultrasonic Instrument Effects on Different Implant Surfaces: Profilometry, Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy, and Microbiology In Vitro Study. Faccioni F; Bevilacqua L; Porrelli D; Khoury A; Faccioni P; Turco G; Frassetto A; Maglione M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(3):520-528. PubMed ID: 34115066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study. Fox SC; Moriarty JD; Kusy RP J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effect of low direct current on anaerobic multispecies biofilm adhering to a titanium implant surface. Sahrmann P; Zehnder M; Mohn D; Meier A; Imfeld T; Thurnheer T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):552-6. PubMed ID: 23167678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The influence of titanium surfaces in cultures of neonatal rat calvarial osteoblast-like cells: an immunohistochemical study. Aybar B; Emes Y; Atalay B; Tanrikulu S; Kaya AS; Işsever H; Ceyhan T; Bilir A Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 19212240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Treatment of subgingival implant surfaces with Teflon-coated sonic and ultrasonic scaler tips and various implant curettes. An in vitro study. Rühling A; Kocher T; Kreusch J; Plagmann HC Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Mar; 5(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 8038341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of different methods to clean titanium abutments. A scanning electron microscopic study. Speelman JA; Collaert B; Klinge B Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Sep; 3(3):120-7. PubMed ID: 1290792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces. Augthun M; Tinschert J; Huber A J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):857-64. PubMed ID: 9736367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The roles of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 pathway in regulating osteogenic differentiation of murine preosteoblasts MC3T3-E1 cells on roughened titanium surfaces. Zhuang LF; Jiang HH; Qiao SC; Appert C; Si MS; Gu YX; Lai HC J Biomed Mater Res A; 2012 Jan; 100(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 21997903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]