148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23525086)
1. (Sample) size matters! An examination of sample size from the SPRINT trial study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedullary nails in patients with tibial fractures.
; Bhandari M; Tornetta P; Rampersad SA; Sprague S; Heels-Ansdell D; Sanders DW; Schemitsch EH; Swiontkowski M; Walter S
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Apr; 27(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 23525086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic evaluation of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing in patients with closed and open tibial fractures: results from the study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedullary nails in patients with tibial fractures (SPRINT).
; Briel M; Sprague S; Heels-Ansdell D; Guyatt G; Bhandari M; Blackhouse G; Sanders D; Schemitsch E; Swiontkowski M; Tornetta P; Walter SD; Goeree R
Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 21669369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedually nails in patients with tibial fractures (S.P.R.I.N.T.): study rationale and design.
; Bhandari M; Guyatt G; Tornetta P; Schemitsch E; Swiontkowski M; Sanders D; Walter SD
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Jun; 9():91. PubMed ID: 18573205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of open and closed tibial fractures: a subgroup analysis of randomised trials.
Xue D; Zheng Q; Li H; Qian S; Zhang B; Pan Z
Int Orthop; 2010 Dec; 34(8):1307-13. PubMed ID: 19841919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in adults.
Duan X; Al-Qwbani M; Zeng Y; Zhang W; Xiang Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jan; 1():CD008241. PubMed ID: 22258982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A meta-analysis of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of closed tibial fractures.
Xia L; Zhou J; Zhang Y; Mei G; Jin D
Orthopedics; 2014 Apr; 37(4):e332-8. PubMed ID: 24762836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A critical appraisal of the SPRINT trial.
Helfet DL; Suk M; Hanson B
Orthop Clin North Am; 2010 Apr; 41(2):241-7. PubMed ID: 20399363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective, randomized study of intramedullary nails inserted with and without reaming for the treatment of open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft.
Finkemeier CG; Schmidt AH; Kyle RF; Templeman DC; Varecka TF
J Orthop Trauma; 2000; 14(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 10791670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures.
; Bhandari M; Guyatt G; Tornetta P; Schemitsch EH; Swiontkowski M; Sanders D; Walter SD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Dec; 90(12):2567-78. PubMed ID: 19047701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of acute reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing on compartment pressure when treating closed tibial shaft fractures: a randomized prospective study.
Nassif JM; Gorczyca JT; Cole JK; Pugh KJ; Pienkowski D
J Orthop Trauma; 2000 Nov; 14(8):554-8. PubMed ID: 11149501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reamed versus minimally reamed nailing: a prospectively randomised study of 100 patients with closed fractures of the tibia.
Gaebler C; McQueen MM; Vécsei V; Court-Brown CM
Injury; 2011 Sep; 42 Suppl 4():S17-21. PubMed ID: 21939798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?
Schemitsch EH; Kumar A; Heels-Ansdell D; Sprague S; Bhandari M; Guyatt G; Sanders DW; Swiontkowski M; Tornetta P; Walter S;
Can J Surg; 2023; 66(4):E384-E389. PubMed ID: 37442585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reamed or unreamed nailing for closed tibial fractures. A prospective study in Tscherne C1 fractures.
Court-Brown CM; Will E; Christie J; McQueen MM
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Jul; 78(4):580-3. PubMed ID: 8682824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unstable fractures of the tibia treated with a reamed intramedullary interlocking nail.
Wiss DA; Stetson WB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Jun; (315):56-63. PubMed ID: 7634687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-analysis of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for open tibial fractures.
Shao Y; Zou H; Chen S; Shan J
J Orthop Surg Res; 2014 Aug; 9():74. PubMed ID: 25149501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reaming Does Not Affect Functional Outcomes After Open and Closed Tibial Shaft Fractures: The Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Lin CA; Swiontkowski M; Bhandari M; Walter SD; Schemitsch EH; Sanders D; Tornetta P
J Orthop Trauma; 2016 Mar; 30(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 26618662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures.
Vallier HA; Cureton BA; Patterson BM
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Dec; 25(12):736-41. PubMed ID: 21904230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes assessment in the SPRINT multicenter tibial fracture trial: Adjudication committee size has trivial effect on trial results.
; Simunovic N; Walter S; Devereaux PJ; Sprague S; Guyatt GH; Schemitsch E; Tornetta P; Sanders D; Swiontkowski M; Bhandari M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):1023-33. PubMed ID: 21439784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of reamed and unreamed nailing of the tibia.
Anglen JO; Blue JM
J Trauma; 1995 Aug; 39(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7674406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Infection after reamed intramedullary nailing of lower limb fractures. A review of 1,464 cases over 15 years.
Jenny JY; Jenny G; Kempf I
Acta Orthop Scand; 1994 Feb; 65(1):94-6. PubMed ID: 8154294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
