BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23526775)

  • 1. Latest developments in molecular docking: 2010-2011 in review.
    Yuriev E; Ramsland PA
    J Mol Recognit; 2013 May; 26(5):215-39. PubMed ID: 23526775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improvements, trends, and new ideas in molecular docking: 2012-2013 in review.
    Yuriev E; Holien J; Ramsland PA
    J Mol Recognit; 2015 Oct; 28(10):581-604. PubMed ID: 25808539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review.
    Yuriev E; Agostino M; Ramsland PA
    J Mol Recognit; 2011; 24(2):149-64. PubMed ID: 21360606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of Monte Carlo-based receptor ensemble docking to virtual screening for GPCR ligands.
    Vilar S; Costanzi S
    Methods Enzymol; 2013; 522():263-78. PubMed ID: 23374190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Molecular recognition and docking algorithms.
    Brooijmans N; Kuntz ID
    Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct; 2003; 32():335-73. PubMed ID: 12574069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development.
    Geromichalos GD
    J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding the challenges of protein flexibility in drug design.
    Antunes DA; Devaurs D; Kavraki LE
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015 Dec; 10(12):1301-13. PubMed ID: 26414598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
    Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
    Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of the FACTS solvation model for protein-ligand docking calculations. Application to EADock.
    Zoete V; Grosdidier A; Cuendet M; Michielin O
    J Mol Recognit; 2010; 23(5):457-61. PubMed ID: 20101644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molecular flexibility in ab initio drug docking to DNA: binding-site and binding-mode transitions in all-atom Monte Carlo simulations.
    Rohs R; Bloch I; Sklenar H; Shakked Z
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005; 33(22):7048-57. PubMed ID: 16352865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of experimental design to optimize docking performance: the case of LiGenDock, the docking module of LiGen, a new de novo design program.
    Beato C; Beccari AR; Cavazzoni C; Lorenzi S; Costantino G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1503-17. PubMed ID: 23590204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computational approach to de novo discovery of fragment binding for novel protein states.
    Konteatis ZD; Klon AE; Zou J; Meshkat S
    Methods Enzymol; 2011; 493():357-80. PubMed ID: 21371598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ligand-guided receptor optimization.
    Katritch V; Rueda M; Abagyan R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 857():189-205. PubMed ID: 22323222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications.
    Kitchen DB; Decornez H; Furr JR; Bajorath J
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2004 Nov; 3(11):935-49. PubMed ID: 15520816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved lead-finding for kinase targets using high-throughput docking.
    McInnes C
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2006 May; 9(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 16729730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated docking for novel drug discovery.
    Bello M; Martínez-Archundia M; Correa-Basurto J
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2013 Jul; 8(7):821-34. PubMed ID: 23642085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lead optimization via high-throughput molecular docking.
    Joseph-McCarthy D; Baber JC; Feyfant E; Thompson DC; Humblet C
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):264-74. PubMed ID: 17554852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.