These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23526891)

  • 1. RFECS: a random-forest based algorithm for enhancer identification from chromatin state.
    Rajagopal N; Xie W; Li Y; Wagner U; Wang W; Stamatoyannopoulos J; Ernst J; Kellis M; Ren B
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(3):e1002968. PubMed ID: 23526891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Opening up the blackbox: an interpretable deep neural network-based classifier for cell-type specific enhancer predictions.
    Kim SG; Theera-Ampornpunt N; Fang CH; Harwani M; Grama A; Chaterji S
    BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):54. PubMed ID: 27490187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancer prediction with histone modification marks using a hybrid neural network model.
    Lim A; Lim S; Kim S
    Methods; 2019 Aug; 166():48-56. PubMed ID: 30905748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancer prediction in the human genome by probabilistic modelling of the chromatin feature patterns.
    Osmala M; Lähdesmäki H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):317. PubMed ID: 32689977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancer identification in mouse embryonic stem cells using integrative modeling of chromatin and genomic features.
    Chen CY; Morris Q; Mitchell JA
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Apr; 13():152. PubMed ID: 22537144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinct and predictive histone lysine acetylation patterns at promoters, enhancers, and gene bodies.
    Rajagopal N; Ernst J; Ray P; Wu J; Zhang M; Kellis M; Ren B
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Aug; 4(11):2051-63. PubMed ID: 25122670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EP-DNN: A Deep Neural Network-Based Global Enhancer Prediction Algorithm.
    Kim SG; Harwani M; Grama A; Chaterji S
    Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():38433. PubMed ID: 27929098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of regulatory elements in mammalian genomes using chromatin signatures.
    Won KJ; Chepelev I; Ren B; Wang W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():547. PubMed ID: 19094206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DELTA: A Distal Enhancer Locating Tool Based on AdaBoost Algorithm and Shape Features of Chromatin Modifications.
    Lu Y; Qu W; Shan G; Zhang C
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130622. PubMed ID: 26091399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Active enhancer positions can be accurately predicted from chromatin marks and collective sequence motif data.
    Podsiadło A; Wrzesień M; Paja W; Rudnicki W; Wilczyński B
    BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S16. PubMed ID: 24565409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eukaryotic enhancers: common features, regulation, and participation in diseases.
    Erokhin M; Vassetzky Y; Georgiev P; Chetverina D
    Cell Mol Life Sci; 2015 Jun; 72(12):2361-75. PubMed ID: 25715743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential analysis of chromatin accessibility and histone modifications for predicting mouse developmental enhancers.
    Fu S; Wang Q; Moore JE; Purcaro MJ; Pratt HE; Fan K; Gu C; Jiang C; Zhu R; Kundaje A; Lu A; Weng Z
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Nov; 46(21):11184-11201. PubMed ID: 30137428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sequence based prediction of enhancer regions from DNA random walk.
    Singh AP; Mishra S; Jabin S
    Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):15912. PubMed ID: 30374023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate Promoter and Enhancer Identification in 127 ENCODE and Roadmap Epigenomics Cell Types and Tissues by GenoSTAN.
    Zacher B; Michel M; Schwalb B; Cramer P; Tresch A; Gagneur J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169249. PubMed ID: 28056037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating diverse datasets improves developmental enhancer prediction.
    Erwin GD; Oksenberg N; Truty RM; Kostka D; Murphy KK; Ahituv N; Pollard KS; Capra JA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2014 Jun; 10(6):e1003677. PubMed ID: 24967590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved regulatory element prediction based on tissue-specific local epigenomic signatures.
    He Y; Gorkin DU; Dickel DE; Nery JR; Castanon RG; Lee AY; Shen Y; Visel A; Pennacchio LA; Ren B; Ecker JR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Feb; 114(9):E1633-E1640. PubMed ID: 28193886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating Enhancer Function and Transcription.
    Field A; Adelman K
    Annu Rev Biochem; 2020 Jun; 89():213-234. PubMed ID: 32197056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture.
    Cubeñas-Potts C; Rowley MJ; Lyu X; Li G; Lei EP; Corces VG
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Feb; 45(4):1714-1730. PubMed ID: 27899590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans.
    Rada-Iglesias A; Bajpai R; Swigut T; Brugmann SA; Flynn RA; Wysocka J
    Nature; 2011 Feb; 470(7333):279-83. PubMed ID: 21160473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Progress and challenges in bioinformatics approaches for enhancer identification.
    Kleftogiannis D; Kalnis P; Bajic VB
    Brief Bioinform; 2016 Nov; 17(6):967-979. PubMed ID: 26634919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.