131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23526905)
1. Percutaneous minimally invasive versus open spine surgery in the treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: a comparative effectiveness review.
Barbagallo GM; Yoder E; Dettori JR; Albanese V
Evid Based Spine Care J; 2012 Aug; 3(3):43-9. PubMed ID: 23526905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive spine surgeries for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures of spine: A systematic review.
Pannu CD; Farooque K; Sharma V; Singal D
J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2019 Oct; 10(Suppl 1):S147-S155. PubMed ID: 31695274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Effectiveness and Economic Evaluations of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Posterior or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review.
Goldstein CL; Phillips FM; Rampersaud YR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S74-89. PubMed ID: 26825793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Balloon kyphoplasty: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2004; 4(12):1-45. PubMed ID: 23074451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flexion-distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spine: open fusion versus percutaneous pedicle screw fixation.
Grossbach AJ; Dahdaleh NS; Abel TJ; Woods GD; Dlouhy BJ; Hitchon PW
Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E2. PubMed ID: 23905953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive lateral corpectomy for thoracolumbar traumatic burst fractures.
Podet AG; Morrow KD; Robichaux JM; Shields JA; DiGiorgio AM; Tender GC
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E12. PubMed ID: 32871572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Novel Surgical Strategies.
Chi JH; Eichholz KM; Anderson PA; Arnold PM; Dailey AT; Dhall SS; Harrop JS; Hoh DJ; Qureshi S; Rabb CH; Raksin PB; Kaiser MG; O'Toole JE
Neurosurgery; 2019 Jan; 84(1):E59-E62. PubMed ID: 30299485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does minimal access tubular assisted spine surgery increase or decrease complications in spinal decompression or fusion?
Fourney DR; Dettori JR; Norvell DC; Dekutoski MB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9 Suppl):S57-65. PubMed ID: 20407352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and radiographic parameters associated with best versus worst clinical outcomes in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery.
Than KD; Park P; Fu KM; Nguyen S; Wang MY; Chou D; Nunley PD; Anand N; Fessler RG; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Akbarnia BA; Deviren V; Uribe JS; La Marca F; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO; Mundis GM; Mummaneni PV;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 26943254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Fibular Plating for AO/OTA 44-B Ankle Fractures.
Chiang CC; Tzeng YH; Lin CC; Huang CK; Chang MC
Foot Ankle Int; 2016 Jun; 37(6):611-9. PubMed ID: 26740306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative study of minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and open surgery in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures].
Ye H; Chen QX
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Feb; 30(2):105-109. PubMed ID: 29349998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors.
Wong AP; Lall RR; Dahdaleh NS; Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Wong RH; Harvey MJ; Lam S; Koski TR; Fessler RG
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Aug; 39(2):E11. PubMed ID: 26235009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive spine surgery in chronic low back pain patients.
Spoor AB; Öner FC
J Neurosurg Sci; 2013 Sep; 57(3):203-18. PubMed ID: 23877267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
