162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23527368)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel porous-structure implant: finite element study.
Inglam S; Chantarapanich N; Suebnukarn S; Vatanapatimakul N; Sucharitpwatskul S; Sitthiseripratip K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e48-56. PubMed ID: 23527368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution of bone tissue around porous titanium implant].
Liu TS; Gao R; Wei T; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30630257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress distribution and micromotion analyses of immediately loaded implants of varying lengths in the mandible and fibular bone grafts: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Wu JC; Chen CS; Yip SW; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e77-84. PubMed ID: 23057046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Pessoa RS; Vaz LG; Marcantonio E; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 20862404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical investigation of thread designs and interface conditions of zirconia and titanium dental implants with bone: three-dimensional numeric analysis.
Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Huang HL; Chen MY; Shen YW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e64-71. PubMed ID: 23527370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 3-D finite element study of the influence of crown-implant ratio on stress distribution.
de Moraes SL; Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DA; de Mello CC; Pellizzer EP
Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 24474362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Influence of Bone Quality on the Biomechanical Behavior of a Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Tsouknidas A; Giannopoulos D; Savvakis S; Michailidis N; Lympoudi E; Fytanidis D; Pissiotis A; Michalakis K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):e143-e154. PubMed ID: 27861651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Single Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Anterior Maxilla, with Different Surgical Techniques and Implant Types.
Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DA; de Souza Batista VE; Araujo Lemos CA; Mello CC; Pellizzer EP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):e191-e198. PubMed ID: 28708909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.
Pessoa RS; Bezerra FJ; Sousa RM; Vander Sloten J; Casati MZ; Jaecques SV
J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):1161-71. PubMed ID: 24635544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influences of Implant and Framework Materials on Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.
Bahadirli G; Yilmaz S; Jones T; Sen D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):e117-e126. PubMed ID: 30231094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical Behavior of the Dental Implant Macrodesign.
Lima de Andrade C; Carvalho MA; Bordin D; da Silva WJ; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28291847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical response at peri-implant mandibular bone for variation of pore characteristics of implants: A Finite Element Study.
Sarkar S; Sahu TP; Datta A; Chandra N; Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Chowdhury AR
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 31741483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs.
Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19884034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Optimized thread pitch design and stress analysis of the cylinder screwed dental implant].
Kong L; Liu BL; Hu KJ; Li DH; Song YL; Ma P; Yang J
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Dec; 24(6):509-12, 515. PubMed ID: 17334071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Integration Patterns Around Implant Neck on Stress Distribution in Peri-Implant Bone: A Finite Element Analysis.
Han J; Sun Y; Wang C
J Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 26(6):549-558. PubMed ID: 26799928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing the influence of crestal cortical bone and sinus floor cortical bone in posterior maxilla bi-cortical dental implantation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Yan X; Zhang X; Chi W; Ai H; Wu L
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 25330164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
