502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23527900)
1. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
Marino R; Linton N; Eikelboom RH; Statham E; Rajan GP
Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional outcomes of Vibrant Soundbridge applied on the middle ear windows in comparison with conventional hearing aids.
Gunduz B; Atas A; Bayazıt YA; Goksu N; Gokdogan C; Tutar H
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):1306-10. PubMed ID: 23039370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.
Mojallal H; Schwab B; Hinze AL; Giere T; Lenarz T
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
Streitberger C; Perotti M; Beltrame MA; Giarbini N
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Round window vibroplasty: long-term results.
Böheim K; Mlynski R; Lenarz T; Schlögel M; Hagen R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22779784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional results of Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implants in conductive and mixed hearing losses.
Bernardeschi D; Hoffman C; Benchaa T; Labassi S; Beliaeff M; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB
Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16(6):381-7. PubMed ID: 21228566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The active middle ear implant for the rehabilitation of sensorineural, mixed and conductive hearing losses].
Sprinzl GM; Wolf-Magele A; Schnabl J; Koci V
Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Sep; 90(9):560-72. PubMed ID: 21913153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vibrant SoundBridge application to middle ear windows versus conventional hearing aids: a comparative study based on international outcome inventory for hearing aids.
Atas A; Tutar H; Gunduz B; Bayazıt YA
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jan; 271(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 23400404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new vibroplasty coupling technique as a treatment for conductive and mixed hearing losses: a report of 4 cases.
Huber AM; Mlynski R; Müller J; Dillier N; Holzmann D; Wolframm MD; Hagen R
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):613-7. PubMed ID: 22429947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The bone conduction implant: Clinical results of the first six patients.
Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Taghavi H; Fredén Jansson KJ; Eeg-Olofsson M
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 25705995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Round window stimulation with the Vibrant Soundbridge: Comparison of direct and indirect coupling.
Olszewski L; Jedrzejczak WW; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
Laryngoscope; 2017 Dec; 127(12):2843-2849. PubMed ID: 28220497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A
Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
Vyskocil E; Riss D; Honeder C; Arnoldner C; Hamzavi JS; Baumgartner WD; Flak S; Gstoettner W
Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
Lenarz T; Weber BP; Issing PR; Gnadeberg D; Ambjørnsen K; Mack KF; Winter M
Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vibrant soundbridge versus conventional hearing aid in sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss: a prospective study.
Truy E; Philibert B; Vesson JF; Labassi S; Collet L
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 18434928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of active middle ear implants in patients with severe mixed hearing loss.
Verhaegen VJ; Mulder JJ; Cremers CW; Snik AF
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 22366752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.
Lee JM; Jung J; Moon IS; Kim SH; Choi JY
Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
