288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23528305)
1. The effects of exposure to traumatic stressors on inhibitory control in police officers: a dense electrode array study using a Go/NoGo continuous performance task.
Covey TJ; Shucard JL; Violanti JM; Lee J; Shucard DW
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):363-75. PubMed ID: 23528305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An event-related potential study of attention deficits in posttraumatic stress disorder during auditory and visual Go/NoGo continuous performance tasks.
Shucard JL; McCabe DC; Szymanski H
Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 18590795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Implication of Altered Inhibitory Response in Patients with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Electrophysiological Evidence from a Go/Nogo Task.
Min D; Kwon A; Kim Y; Jin MJ; Kim YW; Jeon H; Kim S; Jeon HJ; Lee SH
Brain Topogr; 2020 Mar; 33(2):208-220. PubMed ID: 32034577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.
Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Verbal retrieval deficits due to traumatic brain injury are associated with changes in event related potentials during a Go-NoGo task.
Chiang HS; Motes M; Afkhami-Rohani B; Adhikari A; LoBue C; Kraut M; Cullum CM; Hart J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2024 Jul; 163():1-13. PubMed ID: 38663098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Response inhibition and attention processing in 5- to 7-year-old children with and without symptoms of ADHD: An ERP study.
Spronk M; Jonkman LM; Kemner C
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2738-52. PubMed ID: 18951061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mental fatigue and impaired response processes: event-related brain potentials in a Go/NoGo task.
Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 19135100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography.
Lavric A; Pizzagalli DA; Forstmeier S
Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(9):2483-8. PubMed ID: 15525290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The development of stop-signal and Go/Nogo response inhibition in children aged 7-12 years: performance and event-related potential indices.
Johnstone SJ; Dimoska A; Smith JL; Barry RJ; Pleffer CB; Chiswick D; Clarke AR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 16919346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effects of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment on Go/NoGo Semantic Categorization Task Performance and Event-Related Potentials.
Mudar RA; Chiang HS; Eroh J; Nguyen LT; Maguire MJ; Spence JS; Kung F; Kraut MA; Hart J
J Alzheimers Dis; 2016; 50(2):577-90. PubMed ID: 26836634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of amnestic mild cognitive impairment on N2 and P3 Go/NoGo ERP components.
Cid-Fernández S; Lindín M; Díaz F
J Alzheimers Dis; 2014; 38(2):295-306. PubMed ID: 23963292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
Jia H; Li H; Yu D
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Event-related potentials for response inhibition in Parkinson's disease.
Bokura H; Yamaguchi S; Kobayashi S
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):967-75. PubMed ID: 15716167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Event-related potentials to response production and inhibition in go/nogo task. I. Topographical characteristics to different visual stimulus sequences].
Kaga Y; Iwadare Y; Noguchi S; Tando T; Aihara M
No To Hattatsu; 2008 Jan; 40(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 18210859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Information processing differences and similarities in adults with dyslexia and adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder during a Continuous Performance Test: a study of cortical potentials.
Dhar M; Been PH; Minderaa RB; Althaus M
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):3045-56. PubMed ID: 20600194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neurocognitive deficits in male alcoholics: an ERP/sLORETA analysis of the N2 component in an equal probability Go/NoGo task.
Pandey AK; Kamarajan C; Tang Y; Chorlian DB; Roopesh BN; Manz N; Stimus A; Rangaswamy M; Porjesz B
Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):170-82. PubMed ID: 22024409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
