151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23528569)
21. Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm.
Gur D; Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Chough DM; Hakim CM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Mar; 196(3):737-41. PubMed ID: 21343521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Zhang W; Doi K; Giger ML; Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA
Med Phys; 1996 Apr; 23(4):595-601. PubMed ID: 8860907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A dual-energy subtraction technique for microcalcification imaging in digital mammography--a signal-to-noise analysis.
Lemacks MR; Kappadath SC; Shaw CC; Liu X; Whitman GJ
Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1739-51. PubMed ID: 12201421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A quantitative method for evaluating the detectability of lesions in digital mammography.
Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):214-8. PubMed ID: 18319282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A method for detecting microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Wallet BC; Solka JL; Priebe CE
J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):136-9. PubMed ID: 9268859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: noise reduction techniques.
Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(19):5421-43. PubMed ID: 18765887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Digital mammography: effects of reduced radiation dose on diagnostic performance.
Samei E; Saunders RS; Baker JA; Delong DM
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):396-404. PubMed ID: 17356178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film).
Rong XJ; Shaw CC; Johnston DA; Lemacks MR; Liu X; Whitman GJ; Dryden MJ; Stephens TW; Thompson SK; Krugh KT; Lai CJ
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61. PubMed ID: 12349926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Noise equalization for detection of microcalcification clusters in direct digital mammogram images.
McLoughlin KJ; Bones PJ; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar; 23(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 15027524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies.
Ruschin M; Timberg P; Båth M; Hemdal B; Svahn T; Saunders RS; Samei E; Andersson I; Mattsson S; Chakrabort DP; Tingber A
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):400-7. PubMed ID: 17388156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI): an application to the measurement of microcalcification image quality of directly acquired digital images.
Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1269-77. PubMed ID: 9284251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Breast cancer diagnosis: analyzing texture of tissue surrounding microcalcifications.
Karahaliou AN; Boniatis IS; Skiadopoulos SG; Sakellaropoulos FN; Arikidis NS; Likaki EA; Panayiotakis GS; Costaridou LI
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Nov; 12(6):731-8. PubMed ID: 19000952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network.
Zhang W; Doi K; Giger ML; Wu Y; Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA
Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 8058017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Hundertmark C; Sachs J; Gruhl T; Sperner W; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A novel approach to microcalcification detection using fuzzy logic technique.
Cheng HD; Lui YM; Freimanis RI
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Jun; 17(3):442-50. PubMed ID: 9735907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A ranklet-based image representation for mass classification in digital mammograms.
Masotti M
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3951-61. PubMed ID: 17089857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. How Does the Display Luminance Level Affect Detectability of Breast Microcalcifications and Spiculated Lesions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Images?
Ferranti C; Primolevo A; Cartia F; Cavatorta C; Ciniselli CM; Lualdi M; Meroni S; Pignoli E; Plebani M; Siciliano C; Verderio P; Scaperrotta G
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 28189505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Convolutional Neural Networks for the Segmentation of Microcalcification in Mammography Imaging.
Valvano G; Santini G; Martini N; Ripoli A; Iacconi C; Chiappino D; Della Latta D
J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():9360941. PubMed ID: 31093321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Detection of masses and calcifications by soft-copy reading: comparison of two postprocessing algorithms for full-field digital mammography.
Uematsu T
Jpn J Radiol; 2009 May; 27(4):168-75. PubMed ID: 19499307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
