485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23529151)
1. Subsidence of polyetheretherketone cage after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Kim MC; Chung HT; Cho JL; Kim DJ; Chung NS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Apr; 26(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 23529151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion.
Le TV; Baaj AA; Dakwar E; Burkett CJ; Murray G; Smith DA; Uribe JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(14):1268-73. PubMed ID: 22695245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk Factors of Cage Subsidence in Patients Received Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Yao YC; Chou PH; Lin HH; Wang ST; Liu CL; Chang MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Oct; 45(19):E1279-E1285. PubMed ID: 32472823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.
Armocida D; Pesce A; Cimatti M; Proietti L; Santoro A; Frati A
World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e57-e63. PubMed ID: 34492389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Cutler AR; Siddiqui S; Mohan AL; Hillard VH; Cerabona F; Das K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 17176018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.
Marchi L; Abdala N; Oliveira L; Amaral R; Coutinho E; Pimenta L
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jul; 19(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 23662890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiological evaluation of anterior lumbar fusion using PEEK cages with adjacent vertebral autograft in spinal deformity long fusion surgeries.
Ni J; Zheng Y; Liu N; Wang X; Fang X; Phukan R; Wood KB
Eur Spine J; 2015 Apr; 24(4):791-9. PubMed ID: 25618451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis.
Schiffman M; Brau SA; Henderson R; Gimmestad G
Spine J; 2003; 3(5):377-87. PubMed ID: 14588950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Solis cage (PEEK) for anterior cervical fusion: preliminary radiological results with emphasis on fusion and subsidence.
Kulkarni AG; Hee HT; Wong HK
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 17321970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Technology: A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of 50 Patients.
Kim CW; Doerr TM; Luna IY; Joshua G; Shen SR; Fu X; Wu AM
World Neurosurg; 2016 Jun; 90():228-235. PubMed ID: 26921700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.
Campbell PG; Cavanaugh DA; Nunley P; Utter PA; Kerr E; Wadhwa R; Stone M
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E10. PubMed ID: 32871573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lumbar disc height and vertebral Hounsfield units: association with interbody cage subsidence.
Pisano AJ; Fredericks DR; Steelman T; Riccio C; Helgeson MD; Wagner SC
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Aug; 49(2):E9. PubMed ID: 32738808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using nonresorbable poly-ether-ether-ketone versus resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide fusion devices: a prospective, randomized study to assess fusion and clinical outcome.
Jiya T; Smit T; Deddens J; Mullender M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 19179917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of a Unilateral Bridging Cage for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 2-Year Clinical Results and Fusion Rate with a Focus on Subsidence.
Heinz von der Hoeh N; Villa T; Galbusera F; Voelker A; Spiegl UA; Jarvers JS; Heyde CE
World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e308-e314. PubMed ID: 29738859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Efficacy analysis of autologous facet joint bone block in lumbar interbody fusion of osteoporosis patients].
Wang DW; Wang HD; Li L; Yin X; Huang W; Guo JD; Yang YF; Liu YH; Zheng Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Oct; 55(5):899-909. PubMed ID: 37807746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature.
Seaman S; Kerezoudis P; Bydon M; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 44():23-29. PubMed ID: 28736113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Poor Bone Quality, Multilevel Surgery, and Narrow and Tall Cages Are Associated with Intraoperative Endplate Injuries and Late-onset Cage Subsidence in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review.
Wu H; Shan Z; Zhao F; Cheung JPY
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jan; 480(1):163-188. PubMed ID: 34324459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol.
Kersten RF; van Gaalen SM; Arts MP; Roes KC; de Gast A; Corbin TP; Öner FC
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Feb; 15():57. PubMed ID: 24568365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative Analysis of Radiologic Outcomes Between Polyetheretherketone and Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Sultana T; Hossain M; Jeong JH; Im S
World Neurosurg; 2023 Nov; 179():e241-e255. PubMed ID: 37611804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages.
Choi JY; Sung KH
Eur Spine J; 2006 Jan; 15(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 15843972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
