294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23529375)
1. Response assessment criteria for glioblastoma: practical adaptation and implementation in clinical trials of antiangiogenic therapy.
Chinot OL; Macdonald DR; Abrey LE; Zahlmann G; Kerloëguen Y; Cloughesy TF
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep; 2013 May; 13(5):347. PubMed ID: 23529375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response assessment in recurrent glioblastoma treated with irinotecan-bevacizumab: comparative analysis of the Macdonald, RECIST, RANO, and RECIST + F criteria.
Gállego Pérez-Larraya J; Lahutte M; Petrirena G; Reyes-Botero G; González-Aguilar A; Houillier C; Guillevin R; Sanson M; Hoang-Xuan K; Delattre JY
Neuro Oncol; 2012 May; 14(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 22492961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of T2/FLAIR Evaluation per RANO Criteria on Response Assessment of Recurrent Glioblastoma Patients Treated with Bevacizumab.
Huang RY; Rahman R; Ballman KV; Felten SJ; Anderson SK; Ellingson BM; Nayak L; Lee EQ; Abrey LE; Galanis E; Reardon DA; Pope WB; Cloughesy TF; Wen PY
Clin Cancer Res; 2016 Feb; 22(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 26490307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology: Implementation and Expansion of the RANO Criteria in a Randomized Phase II Trial of Pediatric Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas.
Jaspan T; Morgan PS; Warmuth-Metz M; Sanchez Aliaga E; Warren D; Calmon R; Grill J; Hargrave D; Garcia J; Zahlmann G
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Sep; 37(9):1581-7. PubMed ID: 27127006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patients With Proneural Glioblastoma May Derive Overall Survival Benefit From the Addition of Bevacizumab to First-Line Radiotherapy and Temozolomide: Retrospective Analysis of the AVAglio Trial.
Sandmann T; Bourgon R; Garcia J; Li C; Cloughesy T; Chinot OL; Wick W; Nishikawa R; Mason W; Henriksson R; Saran F; Lai A; Moore N; Kharbanda S; Peale F; Hegde P; Abrey LE; Phillips HS; Bais C
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Sep; 33(25):2735-44. PubMed ID: 26124478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. RANO 2.0: Update to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria for High- and Low-Grade Gliomas in Adults.
Wen PY; van den Bent M; Youssef G; Cloughesy TF; Ellingson BM; Weller M; Galanis E; Barboriak DP; de Groot J; Gilbert MR; Huang R; Lassman AB; Mehta M; Molinaro AM; Preusser M; Rahman R; Shankar LK; Stupp R; Villanueva-Meyer JE; Wick W; Macdonald DR; Reardon DA; Vogelbaum MA; Chang SM
J Clin Oncol; 2023 Nov; 41(33):5187-5199. PubMed ID: 37774317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antiangiogenic therapy for high-grade glioma.
Khasraw M; Ameratunga MS; Grant R; Wheeler H; Pavlakis N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; (9):CD008218. PubMed ID: 25242542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group.
Wen PY; Macdonald DR; Reardon DA; Cloughesy TF; Sorensen AG; Galanis E; Degroot J; Wick W; Gilbert MR; Lassman AB; Tsien C; Mikkelsen T; Wong ET; Chamberlain MC; Stupp R; Lamborn KR; Vogelbaum MA; van den Bent MJ; Chang SM
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 28(11):1963-72. PubMed ID: 20231676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Pseudoprogression or pseudoresponse: a challenge for the diagnostic imaging in Glioblastoma multiforme].
Payer F
Wien Med Wochenschr; 2011 Jan; 161(1-2):13-9. PubMed ID: 21312094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Standard Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology, Modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology, and Immunotherapy Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology in Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma.
Youssef G; Rahman R; Bay C; Wang W; Lim-Fat MJ; Arnaout O; Bi WL; Cagney DN; Chang YS; Cloughesy TF; DeSalvo M; Ellingson BM; Flood TF; Gerstner ER; Gonzalez Castro LN; Guenette JP; Kim AE; Lee EQ; McFaline-Figueroa JR; Potter CA; Reardon DA; Huang RY; Wen PY
J Clin Oncol; 2023 Jun; 41(17):3160-3171. PubMed ID: 37027809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of pseudoprogression rates and tumor progression patterns in a phase III trial of bevacizumab plus radiotherapy/temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Wick W; Chinot OL; Bendszus M; Mason W; Henriksson R; Saran F; Nishikawa R; Revil C; Kerloeguen Y; Cloughesy T
Neuro Oncol; 2016 Oct; 18(10):1434-41. PubMed ID: 27515827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 2D (RANO) and volumetric methods for assessment of recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab-a report from the BELOB trial.
Gahrmann R; van den Bent M; van der Holt B; Vernhout RM; Taal W; Vos M; de Groot JC; Beerepoot LV; Buter J; Flach ZH; Hanse M; Jasperse B; Smits M
Neuro Oncol; 2017 Jun; 19(6):853-861. PubMed ID: 28204639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamics of circulating hypoxia-mediated miRNAs and tumor response in patients with high-grade glioma treated with bevacizumab.
Siegal T; Charbit H; Paldor I; Zelikovitch B; Canello T; Benis A; Wong ML; Morokoff AP; Kaye AH; Lavon I
J Neurosurg; 2016 Oct; 125(4):1008-1015. PubMed ID: 26799295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Updated Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) for Gliomas.
Youssef G; Wen PY
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep; 2024 Feb; 24(2):17-25. PubMed ID: 38170429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Neuroradiologist's Guide to Operationalizing the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria Version 2.0 for Gliomas in Adults.
Ellingson BM; Sanvito F; Cloughesy TF; Huang RY; Villanueva-Meyer JE; Pope WB; Barboriak DP; Shankar LK; Smits M; Kaufmann TJ; Boxerman JL; Weller M; Galanis E; Groot J; Gilbert MR; Lassman AB; Shiroishi MS; Nabavizadeh A; Mehta M; Stupp R; Wick W; Reardon DA; Vogelbaum MA; van den Bent M; Chang SM; Wen PY
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38926092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, contrast enhancement and perfusion MRI for assessing progression in glioblastoma.
Tensaouti F; Khalifa J; Lusque A; Plas B; Lotterie JA; Berry I; Laprie A; Cohen-Jonathan Moyal E; Lubrano V
Neuroradiology; 2017 Oct; 59(10):1013-1020. PubMed ID: 28842741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What have we learned from trials on antiangiogenic agents in glioblastoma?
Soffietti R; Trevisan E; Rudà R
Expert Rev Neurother; 2014 Jan; 14(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 24417499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phase II trial of upfront bevacizumab and temozolomide for unresectable or multifocal glioblastoma.
Lou E; Peters KB; Sumrall AL; Desjardins A; Reardon DA; Lipp ES; Herndon JE; Coan A; Bailey L; Turner S; Friedman HS; Vredenburgh JJ
Cancer Med; 2013 Apr; 2(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 23634286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study.
Kickingereder P; Isensee F; Tursunova I; Petersen J; Neuberger U; Bonekamp D; Brugnara G; Schell M; Kessler T; Foltyn M; Harting I; Sahm F; Prager M; Nowosielski M; Wick A; Nolden M; Radbruch A; Debus J; Schlemmer HP; Heiland S; Platten M; von Deimling A; van den Bent MJ; Gorlia T; Wick W; Bendszus M; Maier-Hein KH
Lancet Oncol; 2019 May; 20(5):728-740. PubMed ID: 30952559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bevacizumab for the treatment of high-grade glioma: an update after phase III trials.
Khasraw M; Ameratunga M; Grommes C
Expert Opin Biol Ther; 2014 May; 14(5):729-40. PubMed ID: 24655021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
