These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23529609)

  • 1. Things to avoid in meta-analysis.
    Szczesniak A; Gorny B; Kowalewski M; Kolodziejczak M; Kotlarek N
    Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 20(3):513. PubMed ID: 23529609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is MEDLINE alone enough for a meta-analysis?
    Bai Y; Gao J; Zou D; Li Z
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Jul; 26(1):125-6; author reply 126. PubMed ID: 17555429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis: a review of pros and cons.
    Abramson JH
    Public Health Rev; 1990-1991; 18(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 2132882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analysis and its problems.
    Eysenck HJ
    BMJ; 1994 Sep; 309(6957):789-92. PubMed ID: 7950571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection bias in meta-analyses of gene-disease associations.
    Tang JL
    PLoS Med; 2005 Dec; 2(12):e409. PubMed ID: 16363911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis for multi-arm trials with selection bias.
    Chootrakool H; Shi JQ; Yue R
    Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(11):1183-98. PubMed ID: 21538449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the sensitivity of meta-analysis to selection bias: a multiple imputation approach.
    Carpenter J; Rücker G; Schwarzer G
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1066-72. PubMed ID: 21039395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.
    Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Rücker G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 19836925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Meta-analyses and systematic errors in publications].
    Bias R
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(1-2):39-40. PubMed ID: 11281127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Biases in meta-analysis].
    Delgado-Rodríguez M; Sillero-Arenas M
    Med Clin (Barc); 1999; 112 Suppl 1():43-50. PubMed ID: 10618799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response to letter: on the validity of meta-analysis.
    Friedrich-Rust M; Herrmann E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):343. PubMed ID: 20056389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
    Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Considering selection bias when developing a search strategy.
    Nakao YM; Ueshima K; Teramukai S; Tanaka S; Yasuno S; Fujimoto A; Kawakami K; Nakao K
    Arch Intern Med; 2011 Mar; 171(5):471-2; author reply 472-3. PubMed ID: 21403047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality control in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Bown MJ; Sutton AJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 40(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 20732826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis: convenient assumptions and inconvenient truth.
    Marini JJ
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Jan; 36(1):328-9. PubMed ID: 18158438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the validity of meta-analyses: exhaustivity must be warranted, exclusion of duplicate patients too.
    Pambrun E; Bouteloup V; Thiébaut R; Asselineau J; de Lédinghen V; Perez P;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):342-3. PubMed ID: 20079606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Basic meta-analysis: conceptualization and computation.
    Verhulst SJ; Colliver JA
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2009 Feb; 30(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 19218849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comments on 'Sequential meta-analysis: an efficient decision-making tool' by I van der Tweel and C Bollen.
    Thorlund K; Imberger G; Wetterslev J; Brok J; Gluud C
    Clin Trials; 2010 Dec; 7(6):752-3; author reply 754. PubMed ID: 21138922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.