These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23529808)

  • 1. Proposing a vigorous hybrid of the LOEC and ECx.
    deBruyn AM; Elphick JR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Apr; 9(2):345-7. PubMed ID: 23529808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using population level consequences as a basis for determining the "x" in ECx for toxicity testing.
    Iwasaki Y; Hanson N
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Apr; 9(2):344-5. PubMed ID: 23529807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new perspective on the Dunnett procedure: filling the gap between NOEC/LOEC and ECx concepts.
    Delignette-Muller ML; Forfait C; Billoir E; Charles S
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Dec; 30(12):2888-91. PubMed ID: 21932292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do laboratory toxicity tests replicate "real world" exposures?
    Taylor AM; Maher WA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Apr; 9(2):348-9. PubMed ID: 23529810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The pollen tube growth test.
    Kristen U; Kappler R
    Methods Mol Biol; 1995; 43():189-98. PubMed ID: 7550647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toxicity testing in the 21st century.
    Greenberg M; Lowrie K
    Risk Anal; 2009 Apr; 29(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 19335543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Support of science-based decisions concerning the evaluation of the toxicology of mixtures: a new beginning.
    Teuschler L; Klaunig J; Carney E; Chambers J; Conolly R; Gennings C; Giesy J; Hertzberg R; Klaassen C; Kodell R; Paustenbach D; Yang R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Aug; 36(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 12383716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time to get off the fence: the need for definitive international guidance on statistical analysis of ecotoxicity data.
    van Dam RA; Harford AJ; Warne MS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 22308052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can the joint effect of ternary mixtures be predicted from binary mixture toxicity results?
    Cedergreen N; Sørensen H; Svendsen C
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jun; 427-428():229-37. PubMed ID: 22542295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moving beyond mass: the unmet need to consider dose metrics in environmental nanotoxicology studies.
    Hull M; Kennedy AJ; Detzel C; Vikesland P; Chappell MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Oct; 46(20):10881-2. PubMed ID: 23030824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: how will it affect risk assessment?
    Rhomberg LR
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):361-75. PubMed ID: 20574908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel approach to predicting hormetic effects of antibiotic mixtures on Vibrio fischeri.
    Zou X; Lin Z; Deng Z; Yin D
    Chemosphere; 2013 Feb; 90(7):2070-6. PubMed ID: 23200841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing ecotoxicological effect concentrations of chemicals established in multi-species vs. single-species toxicity test systems.
    De Laender F; De Schamphelaere KA; Vanrolleghem PA; Janssen CR
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 18774172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical analysis of literature on low-dose synergy for use in screening chemical mixtures for risk assessment.
    Boobis A; Budinsky R; Collie S; Crofton K; Embry M; Felter S; Hertzberg R; Kopp D; Mihlan G; Mumtaz M; Price P; Solomon K; Teuschler L; Yang R; Zaleski R
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2011 May; 41(5):369-83. PubMed ID: 21309635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The future of toxicity testing.
    Andersen ME; Al-Zoughool M; Croteau M; Westphal M; Krewski D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):163-96. PubMed ID: 20574896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Methodological approaches to evaluation of the toxicity of insecticides].
    Mal'tseva MM; Zaeva GN; Rysina TZ; Timofievskaia LA
    Gig Sanit; 2000; (6):54-8. PubMed ID: 11322119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a neurotoxic equivalence scheme of relative potency for assessing the risk of PCB mixtures.
    Simon T; Britt JK; James RC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 48(2):148-70. PubMed ID: 17475378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A retrospective analysis of the added value of the rat two-generation reproductive toxicity study versus the rat subchronic toxicity study.
    Janer G; Hakkert BC; Piersma AH; Vermeire T; Slob W
    Reprod Toxicol; 2007 Jul; 24(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17600672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bad habits die hard: the NOEC's persistence reflects poorly on ecotoxicology.
    Jager T
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Feb; 31(2):228-9. PubMed ID: 22095471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What to do with NOECS/NOELS--prohibition or innovation?
    Fox DR; Billoir E; Charles S; Delignette-Muller ML; Lopes C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):764-6. PubMed ID: 22987523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.