These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23530175)

  • 41. Bill requires express written consent, not "passive consent.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):6. PubMed ID: 11654275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Teenagers, physicians, and the law in New England.
    Strasburger VC; Eisner JM; Tilson JQ; Rigg CA; Kulig JW
    J Adolesc Health Care; 1985 Sep; 6(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 4044375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States.
    Belling DW; Eberl C
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
    Scuder AC
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Confidentiality, consent, and caring for the adolescent patient.
    Berlan ED; Bravender T
    Curr Opin Pediatr; 2009 Aug; 21(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 19474734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Can a minor refuse assent for emergency care?
    Rettig PJ
    Virtual Mentor; 2012 Oct; 14(10):763-6. PubMed ID: 23351852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Resolving the abortion debate: compromise legislation, an analysis of the abortion policies of the United States, France and Germany.
    Hertberg BL
    Suffolk Transnatl Law R; 1993; 16(2):513-70. PubMed ID: 11659765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Should parents be notified of their minor daughter's abortion? A pregnant question for Florida legislators.
    Parsons CE
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1986; 14(3):719-43. PubMed ID: 11658962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Legal authority for HIV testing of adolescents.
    North RL
    J Adolesc Health Care; 1990 Mar; 11(3):176-87. PubMed ID: 11659305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Consent to medical care of minors: who has authority in Texas?
    Farrell HC
    Texas Bar J; 1979 Jan; 42(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 11664115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Parental consent and family planning research involving minors: case study.
    Herceg-Baron R
    IRB; 1981 Nov; 3(9):5-7. PubMed ID: 11649402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Informed consent approaches for clinical trial participation of infants with minor parents in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.
    De Pretto-Lazarova A; Brancati-Badarau DO; Burri C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237088. PubMed ID: 32750084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The impact of requirements for parental consent on minors' abortions in Mississippi.
    Henshaw SK
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1995; 27(3):120-2. PubMed ID: 7672103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. When is a pregnant minor mature? When is an abortion in her best interests? The Ohio Supreme Court applies Ohio's Abortion Parental Notification Law: In re Jane Doe 1.
    Stuhlbarg SF
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1992; 60(3):907-61. PubMed ID: 11651633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Review of abortion policy: legality, medicaid funding, and parental involvement, 1967-1994.
    Merz JF; Jackson CA; Klerman JA
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1995; 17(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11863033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Whether to Waive Parental Permission in HIV Prevention Research Among Adolescents: Ethical and Legal Considerations.
    Bauman LJ; Mellins CA; Klitzman R
    J Law Med Ethics; 2020 Mar; 48(1):188-201. PubMed ID: 32342775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reproductive health, youth, and the law.
    Paxman JM
    WHO Chron; 1984; 38(5):199-207. PubMed ID: 6396955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
    Ehrlich JS
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.