BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23531167)

  • 1. Using online adverts to increase the uptake of cervical screening amongst "real Eastenders": an opportunistic controlled trial.
    Jones RB; Soler-Lopez M; Zahra D; Shankleman J; Trenchard-Mabere E
    BMC Res Notes; 2013 Mar; 6():117. PubMed ID: 23531167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of Jade Goody's diagnosis and death on the NHS Cervical Screening Programme.
    Lancucki L; Sasieni P; Patnick J; Day TJ; Vessey MP
    J Med Screen; 2012 Jun; 19(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 22653575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Celebrities and screening: a measurable impact on high-grade cervical neoplasia diagnosis from the 'Jade Goody effect' in the UK.
    Casey GM; Morris B; Burnell M; Parberry A; Singh N; Rosenthal AN
    Br J Cancer; 2013 Sep; 109(5):1192-7. PubMed ID: 23963142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Jade Goody Effect: whose cervical screening decisions were influenced by her story?
    Marlow LA; Sangha A; Patnick J; Waller J
    J Med Screen; 2012 Dec; 19(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 23271834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of a television soap opera on the NHS Cervical Screening Programme in the North West of England.
    Howe A; Owen-Smith V; Richardson J
    J Public Health Med; 2002 Dec; 24(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 12546207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of media reporting of cervical cancer in a UK celebrity on a population-based cervical screening programme.
    MacArthur GJ; Wright M; Beer H; Paranjothy S
    J Med Screen; 2011; 18(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 22156146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coverage of Jade Goody's cervical cancer in UK newspapers: a missed opportunity for health promotion?
    Hilton S; Hunt K
    BMC Public Health; 2010 Jun; 10():368. PubMed ID: 20576115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Media coverage and public reaction to a celebrity cancer diagnosis.
    Metcalfe D; Price C; Powell J
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2011 Mar; 33(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 20679285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recruitment to online therapies for depression: pilot cluster randomized controlled trial.
    Jones RB; Goldsmith L; Hewson P; Williams CJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Mar; 15(3):e45. PubMed ID: 23462072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of geographically targeted internet advertisements on Google AdWords for recruitment in a randomized trial.
    Jones RB; Goldsmith L; Williams CJ; Kamel Boulos MN
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):e84. PubMed ID: 22718043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes from a mass media campaign to promote cervical screening in NSW, Australia.
    Morrell S; Perez DA; Hardy M; Cotter T; Bishop JF
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2010 Sep; 64(9):777-83. PubMed ID: 19822553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using Google AdWords for international multilingual recruitment to health research websites.
    Gross MS; Liu NH; Contreras O; Muñoz RF; Leykin Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jan; 16(1):e18. PubMed ID: 24446166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of a mass media campaign on participation rates in a National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: a field experiment.
    Durkin SJ; Broun K; Spittal MJ; Wakefield MA
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jan; 9(1):e024267. PubMed ID: 30813110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does Digital Video Advertising Increase Population-Level Reach of Multimedia Campaigns? Evidence From the 2013 Tips From Former Smokers Campaign.
    Davis KC; Shafer PR; Rodes R; Kim A; Hansen H; Patel D; Coln C; Beistle D
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e235. PubMed ID: 27627853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Television soap opera and the NHS Cervical Screening Programme: follow-up data.
    Owen-Smith V; Howe A; Richardson J
    J Public Health Med; 2003 Jun; 25(2):183. PubMed ID: 12848413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.
    Abdul Rashid RM; Dahlui M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5867-70. PubMed ID: 24289591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Let's talk about smear tests: social marketing for the National Cervical Screening Programme.
    Bethune GR; Lewis HJ
    Public Health; 2009 Sep; 123 Suppl 1():e17-22. PubMed ID: 19740498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Population-based organized cervical cancer screening pilot program in France.
    Hamers FF; Duport N; Beltzer N
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 27(5):486-492. PubMed ID: 28362653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cluster randomised trial of strategies to increase cervical screening uptake at first invitation (STRATEGIC).
    Kitchener HC; Gittins M; Rivero-Arias O; Tsiachristas A; Cruickshank M; Gray A; Brabin L; Torgerson D; Crosbie EJ; Sargent A; Roberts C
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Sep; 20(68):1-138. PubMed ID: 27632816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mobile unit: an effective service for cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
    Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Tatip Y; Boonmak C
    Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Feb; 28(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10195661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.