These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23531260)

  • 1. Muscle activity influence on the kinematics of the cervical spine in rear-end sled tests in female volunteers.
    Dehner C; Schick S; Kraus M; Hell W; Kramer M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(4):369-77. PubMed ID: 23531260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Muscle activity influence on the kinematics of the cervical spine in frontal tests.
    Dehner C; Schick S; Kraus M; Scola A; Hell W; Kramer M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(6):607-13. PubMed ID: 23859764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk of injury of the cervical spine in sled tests in female volunteers.
    Dehner C; Elbel M; Schick S; Walz F; Hell W; Kramer M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jul; 22(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 17399873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of anthropometry on the kinematics of the cervical spine and the risk of injury in sled tests in female volunteers.
    Dehner C; Schick S; Arand M; Elbel M; Hell W; Kramer M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1305-12. PubMed ID: 18606260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical muscle response to posterolateral impacts--effect of head rotation.
    Kumar S; Ferrari R; Narayan Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Nov; 19(9):899-905. PubMed ID: 15475121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electromyographic and kinematic exploration of whiplash-type rear impacts: effect of left offset impact.
    Kumar S; Ferrari R; Narayan Y
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6):656-65; discussion 666-8. PubMed ID: 15541698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-vivo kinematics of the cervical spine in frontal sled tests.
    Dehner C; Schick S; Hell W; Richter P; Kraus M; Kramer M
    Glob J Health Sci; 2013 Feb; 5(3):115-26. PubMed ID: 23618481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The startle response during whiplash: a protective or harmful response?
    Mang DW; Siegmund GP; Inglis JT; Blouin JS
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2012 Aug; 113(4):532-40. PubMed ID: 22700800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterizing trunk muscle activations during simulated low-speed rear impact collisions.
    Fewster KM; Viggiani D; Gooyers CE; Parkinson RJ; Callaghan JP
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(3):314-319. PubMed ID: 31013170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating cervical muscle response and head kinematics during right, left, frontal and rear-seated perturbations.
    Sacher N; Frayne RJ; Dickey JP
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012 Sep; 13(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 22931183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kinetics of the cervical spine in pediatric and adult volunteers during low speed frontal impacts.
    Seacrist T; Arbogast KB; Maltese MR; García-Espaňa JF; Lopez-Valdes FJ; Kent RW; Tanji H; Higuchi K; Balasubramanian S
    J Biomech; 2012 Jan; 45(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 22056197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of head rotation in whiplash-type rear impacts.
    Kumar S; Ferrari R; Narayan Y
    Spine J; 2005; 5(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 15749612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of cervical vertebrae rotations for PMHS and BioRID II in rear impacts.
    Kang YS; Moorhouse K; Herriott R; Bolte JH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14 Suppl():S136-47. PubMed ID: 23905990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of standing or seated pelvis on dummy responses in rear impacts.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():423-31. PubMed ID: 22269526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Kinetics of the head-neck complex in low-speed rear impact.
    Stemper BD; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():245-50. PubMed ID: 12724902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of trunk flexion in healthy volunteers in rear whiplash-type impacts.
    Kumar S; Ferrari R; Narayan Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Aug; 30(15):1742-9. PubMed ID: 16094276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of sternocleidomastoid muscle in simulated low velocity rear-end impacts.
    Hernández IA; Fyfe KR; Heo G; Major PW
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Jun; 15(6):876-85. PubMed ID: 16133079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of belt pretensioning on dummy responses in 40 km/h rear-impact sled tests.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 22239146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiplanar cervical spine injury due to head-turned rear impact.
    Panjabi MM; Ivancic PC; Maak TG; Tominaga Y; Rubin W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):420-9. PubMed ID: 16481952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neck muscle load distribution in lateral, frontal, and rear-end impacts: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Hedenstierna S; Halldin P; Siegmund GP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):2626-33. PubMed ID: 19910765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.