These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23531511)
1. A study of recipient related predictors of success in oocyte donation program. Gupta P; Banker M; Patel P; Joshi B J Hum Reprod Sci; 2012 Sep; 5(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 23531511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of donor sperm in addition to oocyte donation after repeated implantation failure in normozoospermic patients does not improve live birth rates. Blázquez A; García D; Rodríguez A; Vassena R; Vernaeve V Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2549-2553. PubMed ID: 27609983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endometrial preparation: effect of estrogen dose and administration route on reproductive outcomes in oocyte donation cycles with fresh embryo transfer. Madero S; Rodriguez A; Vassena R; Vernaeve V Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1755-64. PubMed ID: 27141040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes. Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do we need to measure progesterone in oocyte donation cycles? A retrospective analysis evaluating cumulative live birth rates and embryo quality. Racca A; De Munck N; Santos-Ribeiro S; Drakopoulos P; Errazuriz J; Galvao A; Popovic-Todorovic B; Mackens S; De Vos M; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; Blockeel C Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):167-174. PubMed ID: 31953546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recipient age and pulsatility index affect uterine receptivity in oocyte donation programmes. Huang LS; Lee MS; Cheng EH; Lee TH; Liu CH; Lee MC; Chou MC Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Jul; 17(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 18616897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors useful in predicting the success of oocyte donation: a 3-year retrospective analysis. Noyes N; Hampton BS; Berkeley A; Licciardi F; Grifo J; Krey L Fertil Steril; 2001 Jul; 76(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 11438325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical experience employing co-culture of human embryos with autologous human endometrial epithelial cells. Rubio C; Simón C; Mercader A; Garcia-Velasco J; Remohí J; Pellicer A Hum Reprod; 2000 Dec; 15 Suppl 6():31-8. PubMed ID: 11261481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improvements achieved in an oocyte donation program over a 10-year period: sequential increase in implantation and pregnancy rates and decrease in high-order multiple pregnancies. Budak E; Garrido N; Soares SR; Melo MA; Meseguer M; Pellicer A; Remohí J Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):342-9. PubMed ID: 17335819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three hundred cycles of oocyte donation at the University of Southern California: assessing the effect of age and infertility diagnosis on pregnancy and implantation rates. Sauer MV; Paulson RJ; Ary BA; Lobo RA J Assist Reprod Genet; 1994 Feb; 11(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 7819708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evidence for a detrimental effect on uterine receptivity of high serum oestradiol concentrations in high and normal responder patients. Simón C; Cano F; Valbuena D; Remohí J; Pellicer A Hum Reprod; 1995 Sep; 10(9):2432-7. PubMed ID: 8530680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The optimal number of embryos to be transferred in shared oocyte donation: walking the thin line between low pregnancy rates and multiple pregnancies. Yaron Y; Amit A; Kogosowski A; Peyser MR; David MP; Lessing JB Hum Reprod; 1997 Apr; 12(4):699-702. PubMed ID: 9159427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the mechanism for higher pregnancy rates in donor oocyte recipients by comparison of fresh with frozen embryo transfer pregnancy rates in a shared oocyte programme. Check JH; O'Shaughnessy A; Lurie D; Fisher C; Adelson HG Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):3022-7. PubMed ID: 8747065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reversing the natural decline in human fertility. An extended clinical trial of oocyte donation to women of advanced reproductive age. Sauer MV; Paulson RJ; Lobo RA JAMA; 1992 Sep; 268(10):1275-9. PubMed ID: 1507373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of the donor oocyte program to evaluate embryo implantation. Check JH Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1994 Sep; 734():198-208. PubMed ID: 7978918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficiency and efficacy of vitrification in 35 654 sibling oocytes from donation cycles. Cornet-Bartolomé D; Rodriguez A; García D; Barragán M; Vassena R Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2262-2271. PubMed ID: 32856058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determinants of pregnancy rate in the donor oocyte model: a multivariate analysis of 450 frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Dessolle L; Daraï E; Cornet D; Rouzier R; Coutant C; Mandelbaum J; Antoine JM Hum Reprod; 2009 Dec; 24(12):3082-9. PubMed ID: 19726449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Thin endometrium in donor oocyte recipients: enigma or obstacle for implantation? Dain L; Bider D; Levron J; Zinchenko V; Westler S; Dirnfeld M Fertil Steril; 2013 Nov; 100(5):1289-95. PubMed ID: 23954352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Embryo implantation rates in oocyte donation: a prospective comparison of tubal versus uterine transfers. Balmaceda JP; Alam V; Roszjtein D; Ord T; Snell K; Asch RH Fertil Steril; 1992 Feb; 57(2):362-5. PubMed ID: 1735489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]