180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23532275)
1. A psychometric evaluation of the Arm Motor Ability Test.
O'Dell MW; Kim G; Rivera L; Fieo R; Christos P; Polistena C; Fitzgerald K; Gorga D
J Rehabil Med; 2013 Jun; 45(6):519-27. PubMed ID: 23532275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Translation and Initial Validation of the Chinese Version of the Action Research Arm Test in People with Stroke.
Zhao JL; Chen PM; Li WF; Bian RH; Ding MH; Li H; Lin Q; Xu ZQ; Mao YR; Huang DF
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():5416560. PubMed ID: 30805366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Convergent Validity and Responsiveness of the SULCS.
Knutson JS; Friedl AS; Hansen KM; Hisel TZ; Harley MY
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Jan; 100(1):140-143.e1. PubMed ID: 30148996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rasch validation and predictive validity of the action research arm test in patients receiving stroke rehabilitation.
Chen HF; Lin KC; Wu CY; Chen CL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 93(6):1039-45. PubMed ID: 22420887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke.
Rabadi MH; Rabadi FM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 87(7):962-6. PubMed ID: 16813784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation.
Hsieh YW; Wu CY; Lin KC; Chang YF; Chen CL; Liu JS
Stroke; 2009 Apr; 40(4):1386-91. PubMed ID: 19228851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical implications of using the arm motor ability test in stroke rehabilitation.
O'Dell MW; Kim G; Finnen LR; Polistena C
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 May; 92(5):830-6. PubMed ID: 21435635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Upper limb motor function in hemiparesis: concurrent validity of the Arm Motor Ability test.
Chae J; Labatia I; Yang G
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Jan; 82(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12510178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation.
Lin KC; Chuang LL; Wu CY; Hsieh YW; Chang WY
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2010; 47(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 20848369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychometric comparison of the shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke rehabilitation.
Fu TS; Wu CY; Lin KC; Hsieh CJ; Liu JS; Wang TN; Ou-Yang P
Clin Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 26(11):1043-7. PubMed ID: 22180444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke.
Lin JH; Hsu MJ; Sheu CF; Wu TS; Lin RT; Chen CH; Hsieh CL
Phys Ther; 2009 Aug; 89(8):840-50. PubMed ID: 19556333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Adult Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke: Psychometric Properties of an Observation-Based Bimanual Upper Limb Performance Measurement.
Van Gils A; Meyer S; Van Dijk M; Thijs L; Michielsen M; Lafosse C; Truyens V; Oostra K; Peeters A; Thijs V; Feys H; Krumlinde-Sundholm L; Kos D; Verheyden G
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Dec; 99(12):2513-2522. PubMed ID: 29807004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-Dose Intensive Therapy Is Necessary for Strong, Clinically Significant, Upper Limb Functional Gains and Retained Gains in Severe/Moderate Chronic Stroke.
Daly JJ; McCabe JP; Holcomb J; Monkiewicz M; Gansen J; Pundik S
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2019 Jul; 33(7):523-537. PubMed ID: 31131743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the streamlined Wolf motor function test as an outcome measure for stroke rehabilitation.
Wu CY; Fu T; Lin KC; Feng CT; Hsieh KP; Yu HW; Lin CH; Hsieh CJ; Ota H
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2011 Feb; 25(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 20947494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a Short Form Assessment Combining the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity and the Wolf Motor Function Test for Evaluating Stroke Recovery.
Woodbury M; Grattan ES; Li CY
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2023 Oct; 104(10):1661-1668. PubMed ID: 37245692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: The Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test.
Nijland R; van Wegen E; Verbunt J; van Wijk R; van Kordelaar J; Kwakkel G
J Rehabil Med; 2010 Jul; 42(7):694-6. PubMed ID: 20603702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The responsiveness and correlation between Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Motor Status Scale, and the Action Research Arm Test in chronic stroke with upper-extremity rehabilitation robotic training.
Wei XJ; Tong KY; Hu XL
Int J Rehabil Res; 2011 Dec; 34(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 22044987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of the Wolf Motor Function Test in motor trials early after stroke.
Edwards DF; Lang CE; Wagner JM; Birkenmeier R; Dromerick AW
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Apr; 93(4):660-8. PubMed ID: 22336104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Singapore version of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity.
Choo SX; Bosch J; Richardson J; Stratford P; Harris JE
Disabil Rehabil; 2019 Oct; 41(21):2570-2577. PubMed ID: 29786453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a short assessment for upper extremity activity capacity early after stroke.
Kristersson T; Persson HC; Alt Murphy M
J Rehabil Med; 2019 Apr; 51(4):257-263. PubMed ID: 30767025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
