BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23532422)

  • 21. [MR-urography and CT-urography: principles, examination techniques, applications].
    Nolte-Ernsting C; Staatz G; Wildberger J; Adam G
    Rofo; 2003 Feb; 175(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 12584621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acute abdominal pain: is there a potential role for MRI in the setting of the emergency department in a patient with renal calculi?
    Kalb B; Sharma P; Salman K; Ogan K; Pattaras JG; Martin DR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Nov; 32(5):1012-23. PubMed ID: 21031504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Static T2w MRU in noncalcular urinary obstruction: comparison of its two techniques.
    Abou El-Ghar M; Shokeir A; Rafaie H; El-Diasty T
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2008 Apr; 8():454-62. PubMed ID: 18454256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Comparison of spiral computed tomography without contrast media and intravenous urography in the diagnosis of renal colic].
    Thibeau JF; Sourtzis S; Bellemans MA; Vandendris M
    Prog Urol; 1999 Apr; 9(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 10370946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnosis of bladder tumours in patients with macroscopic haematuria: a prospective comparison of split-bolus computed tomography urography, magnetic resonance urography and flexible cystoscopy.
    Gandrup KL; Løgager VB; Bretlau T; Nordling J; Thomsen HS
    Scand J Urol; 2015 Jun; 49(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 25438986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urography in the evaluation of acute renal colic.
    Wang JH; Shen SH; Huang SS; Chang CY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2008 Jan; 71(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 18218557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A prospective, matched comparison of ultra-low and standard-dose computed tomography for assessment of renal colic.
    Roberts MJ; Williams J; Khadra S; Nalavenkata S; Kam J; McCombie SP; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Khadra M; Varol C; Winter M; Sanaei F; Loh H; Thakkar Y; Dugdale P; Ko R
    BJU Int; 2020 Sep; 126 Suppl 1():27-32. PubMed ID: 32573114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of magnetic resonance urography to dimercaptosuccinic acid scan for the identification of renal parenchyma defects in children with vesicoureteral reflux.
    Cerwinka WH; Grattan-Smith JD; Jones RA; Haber M; Little SB; Blews DE; Williams JP; Kirsch AJ
    J Pediatr Urol; 2014 Apr; 10(2):344-51. PubMed ID: 24128878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. MR urography using HASTE imaging in the assessment of ureteric obstruction.
    Regan F; Bohlman ME; Khazan R; Rodriguez R; Schultze-Haakh H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1115-20. PubMed ID: 8911161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Magnetic resonance urography in the diagnosis of urinary tract obstruction after renal transplantation.
    Li X; Han Z; Wang W; Zhang Y; Gao J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2002 Apr; 115(4):540-2. PubMed ID: 12133293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Utility of cine MR urography of the urinary tract and comparison with static MR urography.
    Tsubota M; Takahara T; Nitatori T; Hachiya J
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):212-7. PubMed ID: 15468940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patients at high risk for upper tract urothelial cancer: evaluation of hydronephrosis using high resolution magnetic resonance urography.
    Chahal R; Taylor K; Eardley I; Lloyd SN; Spencer JA
    J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):478-82; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16006868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Imaging in ureteral complications of renal transplantation: value of static fluid MR urography.
    Schubert RA; Göckeritz S; Mentzel HJ; Rzanny R; Schubert J; Kaiser WA
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(7):1152-7. PubMed ID: 11003413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of magnetic resonance urography.
    Klein LT; Frager D; Subramanium A; Lowe FC
    Urology; 1998 Oct; 52(4):602-8. PubMed ID: 9763078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: incidence of associated urinary tract findings.
    Katz DS; Lane MJ; Sommer FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1319-22. PubMed ID: 8633440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic value of unenhanced computerized tomography urography in the evaluation of acute renal colic.
    Wang JH; Lin WC; Wei CJ; Chang CY
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2003 Oct; 19(10):503-9. PubMed ID: 14620676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of magnetic resonance urography on preoperative diagnostic workup in children affected by hydronephrosis: should IVU be replaced?
    Leppert A; Nadalin S; Schirg E; Petersen C; Kardorff R; Galanski M; Fuchs J
    J Pediatr Surg; 2002 Oct; 37(10):1441-5. PubMed ID: 12378450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Unenhanced spiral CT in acute ureteral colic: a replacement for excretory urography?
    Ryu JA; Kim B; Jeon YH; Lee J; Lee JW; Jeon SS; Park KH
    Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 11752964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Severity of Hydronephrosis and Its Importance in Renal Colic.
    Leo MM; Langlois BK; Pare JR; Mitchell P; Linden J; Nelson KP; Amanti C; Carmody KA
    West J Emerg Med; 2017 Jun; 18(4):559-568. PubMed ID: 28611874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The relationship between ureteral stone characteristics and secondary signs in renal colic.
    Hiller N; Berkovitz N; Lubashevsky N; Salaima S; Simanovsky N
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(6):768-72. PubMed ID: 23154008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.