These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23532453)
41. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Fernandes P; Díaz-Rey JA; Queirós A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Jorge J Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range. Munkwitz S; Elkarmouty A; Hoffmann EM; Pfeiffer N; Thieme H Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 246(6):875-9. PubMed ID: 18196259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. ICare Pro: Age Dependent Effect of Central Corneal Thickness on Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Patients. Hohberger B; Sommerfeld C; Lucio M; Bergua A Curr Eye Res; 2020 Jun; 45(6):668-674. PubMed ID: 31905299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry. Luebke J; Bryniok L; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Boehringer D; Reinhard T; Wecker T; Anton A Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 39(11):2517-2521. PubMed ID: 30968328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: rebound versus goldmann applanation tonometry. Fuest M; Mamas N; Walter P; Plange N Curr Eye Res; 2014 Sep; 39(9):902-7. PubMed ID: 24588266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Modern disposable hydrogel contact lens removal has a minimal effect on intraocular pressure. Hamilton-Maxwell K; King N Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Mar; 35(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 25761581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The influence of lens power and center thickness on the intraocular pressure measured through soft lenses: a comparison of two noncontact tonometers. Ogbuehi KC Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2012 Jun; 35(3):118-28. PubMed ID: 22322110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of the ICare rebound tonometer as a home intraocular pressure monitoring device. Asrani S; Chatterjee A; Wallace DK; Santiago-Turla C; Stinnett S J Glaucoma; 2011 Feb; 20(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 20436362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The influence of refractive errors on IOP measurement by rebound tonometry (ICare) and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Avitabile T; Longo A; Rocca D; Amato R; Gagliano C; Castaing M Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 248(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 19727794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparability of Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometer in a Wide Range of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness. Tamçelik N; Atalay E; Cicik E; Özkök A Ophthalmic Res; 2015; 54(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 26022193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of intraocular pressure as measured by three different non-contact tonometers and goldmann applanation tonometer for non-glaucomatous subjects. Bang SP; Lee CE; Kim YC BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):199. PubMed ID: 29096616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Oh JH; Yoo C; Kim YY; Kim HM; Song JS Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 247(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 18843499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effect of Manual Upper Eyelid Elevation on Intraocular Pressure Measurement by Four Different Tonometers. Nakakura S; Mori E; Fujio Y; Fujisawa Y; Matsuya K; Kobayashi Y; Oogi S; Shiraishi M; Tabuchi H; Asaoka R; Kiuchi Y Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Feb; 97(2):128-133. PubMed ID: 32011586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A Comparison of Rebound to Indentation Tonometry in Supine Sedated Children with Glaucoma. AlHarkan DH; Al-Shamlan FT; Edward DP; Khan AO Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2016; 23(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 27162450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A comparison of three different tonometric methods in the measurement of intraocular pressure in the pediatric age group. Uzlu D; Akyol N; Türk A; Oruç Y Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Aug; 40(8):1999-2005. PubMed ID: 32328920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evaluation of the impedance tonometers TGDc-01 and iCare according to the international ocular tonometer standards ISO 8612. Ruokonen PC; Schwenteck T; Draeger J Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Sep; 245(9):1259-65. PubMed ID: 17318572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement with Scheimpflug-based noncontact tonometer with and without hydrogel contact lenses. Kumar M; Shetty R; Jayadev C; Dutta D; Nicolsan MD; Nagaraj S; Kumar RS Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 63(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 26044471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Relationship of central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure by iCare rebound tonometer. Rao A; Kumar M; Prakash B; Varshney G J Glaucoma; 2014 Aug; 23(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 23221904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Rebound Self-tonometry Acquisition Time and Ease of Use Evaluated by Newly Trained Optometry Students and Optometrists. Hyatt R; Furtado NM; Eberle D; Jensen K; Tsang T; Kwan J Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Feb; 97(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 32011581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]