These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23532717)

  • 1. Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology.
    Heger T; Pahl AT; Botta-Dukát Z; Gherardi F; Hoppe C; Hoste I; Jax K; Lindström L; Boets P; Haider S; Kollmann J; Wittmann MJ; Jeschke JM
    Ambio; 2013 Sep; 42(5):527-40. PubMed ID: 23532717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emergent insights from the synthesis of conceptual frameworks for biological invasions.
    Gurevitch J; Fox GA; Wardle GM; Inderjit ; Taub D
    Ecol Lett; 2011 Apr; 14(4):407-18. PubMed ID: 21513009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The progress of interdisciplinarity in invasion science.
    Vaz AS; Kueffer C; Kull CA; Richardson DM; Schindler S; Muñoz-Pajares AJ; Vicente JR; Martins J; Hui C; Kühn I; Honrado JP
    Ambio; 2017 May; 46(4):428-442. PubMed ID: 28150137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic models in research and management of biological invasions.
    Buchadas A; Vaz AS; Honrado JP; Alagador D; Bastos R; Cabral JA; Santos M; Vicente JR
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 196():594-606. PubMed ID: 28351824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
    Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Foundations of invasion genetics: the Baker and Stebbins legacy.
    Barrett SC
    Mol Ecol; 2015 May; 24(9):1927-41. PubMed ID: 25442107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parasite Ecology of Invasive Species: Conceptual Framework and New Hypotheses.
    Chalkowski K; Lepczyk CA; Zohdy S
    Trends Parasitol; 2018 Aug; 34(8):655-663. PubMed ID: 29935995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconstructing routes of invasion using genetic data: why, how and so what?
    Estoup A; Guillemaud T
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Oct; 19(19):4113-30. PubMed ID: 20723048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning with the hierarchy-of-hypotheses (HoH) approach discovers novel pattern in studies on biological invasions.
    Ryo M; Jeschke JM; Rillig MC; Heger T
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jan; 11(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 31219681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions.
    Blackburn TM; Pyšek P; Bacher S; Carlton JT; Duncan RP; Jarošík V; Wilson JR; Richardson DM
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2011 Jul; 26(7):333-9. PubMed ID: 21601306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Explaining people's perceptions of invasive alien species: A conceptual framework.
    Shackleton RT; Richardson DM; Shackleton CM; Bennett B; Crowley SL; Dehnen-Schmutz K; Estévez RA; Fischer A; Kueffer C; Kull CA; Marchante E; Novoa A; Potgieter LJ; Vaas J; Vaz AS; Larson BMH
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Jan; 229():10-26. PubMed ID: 30077400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic review of context bias in invasion biology.
    Warren RJ; King JR; Tarsa C; Haas B; Henderson J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182502. PubMed ID: 28817593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward.
    Simberloff D; Martin JL; Genovesi P; Maris V; Wardle DA; Aronson J; Courchamp F; Galil B; García-Berthou E; Pascal M; Pyšek P; Sousa R; Tabacchi E; Vilà M
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2013 Jan; 28(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 22889499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different traits determine introduction, naturalization and invasion success in woody plants: Proteaceae as a test case.
    Moodley D; Geerts S; Richardson DM; Wilson JR
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75078. PubMed ID: 24086442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cryptic invasions: A review.
    Morais P; Reichard M
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Feb; 613-614():1438-1448. PubMed ID: 28648374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clarifying debates in invasion biology: a survey of invasion biologists.
    Young AM; Larson BM
    Environ Res; 2011 Oct; 111(7):893-8. PubMed ID: 21757195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Managing plant invasions through the lens of remote sensing: A review of progress and the way forward.
    Vaz AS; Alcaraz-Segura D; Campos JC; Vicente JR; Honrado JP
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Nov; 642():1328-1339. PubMed ID: 30045513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hierarchy of hypotheses or cascade of predictions? A comment on Heger et al. (2013).
    Farji-Brener AG; Amador-Vargas S
    Ambio; 2014 Dec; 43(8):1112-4. PubMed ID: 25164772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Paradigm of plant invasion: multifaceted review on sustainable management.
    Rai PK
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Dec; 187(12):759. PubMed ID: 26581605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Network Theory to Understand and Predict Biological Invasions.
    Frost CM; Allen WJ; Courchamp F; Jeschke JM; Saul WC; Wardle DA
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2019 Sep; 34(9):831-843. PubMed ID: 31155422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.