These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23533538)

  • 1. EIT-based fabric pressure sensing.
    Yao A; Yang CL; Seo JK; Soleimani M
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():405325. PubMed ID: 23533538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artificial skin through super-sensing method and electrical impedance data from conductive fabric with aid of deep learning.
    Duan X; Taurand S; Soleimani M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):8831. PubMed ID: 31222040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shape deformation in two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Boyle A; Adler A; Lionheart WR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2185-93. PubMed ID: 22711769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
    Boyle A; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. E-Skin Using Fringing Field Electrical Impedance Tomography with an Ionic Liquid Domain.
    Soleimani M; Friedrich M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 35808533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integration of piezo-capacitive and piezo-electric nanoweb based pressure sensors for imaging of static and dynamic pressure distribution.
    Jeong YJ; Oh TI; Woo EJ; Kim KJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():21-24. PubMed ID: 29059801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
    Woo EJ; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design, Characterization, and Performance of Woven Fabric Electrodes for Electrocardiogram Signal Monitoring.
    Zhang M; Guo N; Gao Q; Li H; Wang Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(15):. PubMed ID: 35897976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
    Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Quantitative Evaluation of Drive Pattern Selection for Optimizing EIT-Based Stretchable Sensors.
    Russo S; Nefti-Meziani S; Carbonaro N; Tognetti A
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Aug; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 28858252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design of a microscopic electrical impedance tomography system using two current injections.
    Liu Q; Oh TI; Wi H; Lee EJ; Seo JK; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Sep; 32(9):1505-16. PubMed ID: 21828912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reconstruction of conductivity changes due to ventilation and perfusion from EIT data collected on a rectangular electrode array.
    Mueller JL; Isaacson D; Newell JC
    Physiol Meas; 2001 Feb; 22(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 11236896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ACE1 thoracic Electrical Impedance Tomography system for ventilation and perfusion.
    Mellenthin MM; Mueller JL; Bueno de Camargo ED; Silva de Moura F; Hamilton SJ; Gonzalez Lima R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():4073-6. PubMed ID: 26737189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrode boundary conditions and experimental validation for BEM-based EIT forward and inverse solutions.
    Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH; Isaacson D; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Sep; 25(9):1180-8. PubMed ID: 16967803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intracranial electrical impedance tomography: a method of continuous monitoring in an animal model of head trauma.
    Manwaring PK; Moodie KL; Hartov A; Manwaring KH; Halter RJ
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Oct; 117(4):866-875. PubMed ID: 23842194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct EIT Jacobian calculations for conductivity change and electrode movement.
    Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S89-99. PubMed ID: 18544810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wearable Sensors for Frequency-Multiplexed EIT and Multilead ECG Data Acquisition.
    Rapin M; Braun F; Adler A; Wacker J; Frerichs I; Vogt B; Chetelat O
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Mar; 66(3):810-820. PubMed ID: 30028688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The boundary element method in the forward and inverse problem of electrical impedance tomography.
    de Munck JC; Faes TJ; Heethaar RM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jun; 47(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 10833854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.