166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23534049)
1. Effect of various fixation parameters on strain development of screw- and cement-retained implant-supported restorations.
Schittenhelm B; Karl M; Graef F; Heckmann S; Taylor T
Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 23534049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of material selection on the passivity of fit of implant-supported restorations created with computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture.
Karl M; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):739-45. PubMed ID: 21841982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Torque loss under mechanical cycling of long-span zirconia and titanium-cemented and screw-retained implant-supported CAD/CAM frameworks.
Gomes ÉA; Tiossi R; Faria AC; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1395-402. PubMed ID: 25539006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures.
Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17927737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strain development of screw-retained implant-supported fixed restorations: procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations.
Karl M; Holst S
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 22371839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single Posterior Implant Crown Fabrication. Cement-On Versus Screw-Retained Crowns.
Kosinski T
Dent Today; 2015 Aug; 34(8):74, 76-9. PubMed ID: 26390763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screw Joint Stability in Conventional and Abutment-Free Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations.
Scherg S; Karl M
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 26929952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective comparison of semipermanent and permanent cementation of implant-supported single crowns and FDPs with regard to the incidence of survival and complications.
Schwarz S; Schröder C; Corcodel N; Hassel AJ; Rammelsberg P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e151-8. PubMed ID: 22081988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 15248882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
Wang JH; Judge R; Bailey D
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 27611744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro stress analyses of dental implants supporting screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses.
Kim WD; Jacobson Z; Nathanson D
Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 10635156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinician- and patient-reported long-term evaluation of screw- and cement-retained implant restorations: a 5-year prospective study.
Sherif S; Susarla SM; Hwang JW; Weber HP; Wright RF
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):993-9. PubMed ID: 20809428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Restoration Design on the Removal Torque Loss of Implant-supported Crowns after Cyclic Loading.
Jongsiri S; Arksornnukit M; Homsiang W; Kamonkhantikul K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Dec; 24(12):951-956. PubMed ID: 38317392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of screw- and cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
Silva GC; Cornacchia TM; de Magalhães CS; Bueno AC; Moreira AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1479-88. PubMed ID: 25062583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI) Dental Implant System: an in vitro study.
Tosches NA; Brägger U; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 19126111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
