These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23534049)

  • 41. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL; Kang K; Hirayama H; Garefis PD; Petridis H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Static implant loading caused by as-cast metal and ceramic-veneered superstructures.
    Karl M; Rosch S; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 15798682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
    Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Adjacent Dental Implants Classification Based on Restorative Design.
    Proussaefs P; AlHelal A; Taleb A; Kattadiyil MT
    J Oral Implantol; 2017 Oct; 43(5):405-409. PubMed ID: 28628355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Clinical observation of screw and cement-retained implant-supported restoration of fixed bridges].
    Song T; Xu PC; Li Y
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Jun; 20(3):296-9. PubMed ID: 21779741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.
    Dogus SM; Kurtz KS; Watanabe I; Griggs JA
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 21585587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of Preseating, Screw Access Opening, and Vent Holes on Extrusion of Excess Cement at the Crown-Abutment Margin and Associated Tensile Force for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations.
    Jimenez RA; Vargas-Koudriavtsev T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 27447146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Screw- versus cement-retained implant prostheses: a systematic review of prosthodontic maintenance and complications.
    Ma S; Fenton A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):127-45. PubMed ID: 25822297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical evaluation of the incidence of prosthetic complications in implant crowns constructed with UCLA castable abutments. A cohort follow-up study.
    Montero J; Manzano G; Beltrán D; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ; Castillo-Oyagüe R
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1081-9. PubMed ID: 22982530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fabrication of a cement- and screw-retained implant prosthesis.
    Rajan M; Gunaseelan R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):578-80. PubMed ID: 15583566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. What's your choice: cement- or screw-retained implant restorations?
    Strong SM
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 18254555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screw-cement-retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crowns.
    Al-Omari WM; Shadid R; Abu-Naba'a L; El Masoud B
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jun; 19(4):263-73. PubMed ID: 20136704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Current status of implant-abutment--part 1: abutments for cemented versus screw retained restorations].
    Harel N; Livne S; Piek D; Marku-Cohen S; Ormianer Z
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Jan; 29(1):19-25, 63. PubMed ID: 22991873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A microstrain comparison of passively fitting screw-retained and cemented titanium frameworks.
    de Vasconcellos DK; Kojima AN; Mesquita AM; Bottino MA; Ozcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):834-8. PubMed ID: 24798096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effects of height and surface roughness of abutments and the type of cement on bond strength of cement-retained implant restorations.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Abu-Sitta EH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):638-44. PubMed ID: 21039897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A systematic review of screw- versus cement-retained implant-supported fixed restorations.
    Sherif S; Susarla HK; Kapos T; Munoz D; Chang BM; Wright RF
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jan; 23(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 24382004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CA; de Souza Batista VE; Almeida DA; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 26589441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.