181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23534701)
1. Long-term in vivo imaging of viscoelastic properties of the mouse brain after controlled cortical impact.
Boulet T; Kelso ML; Othman SF
J Neurotrauma; 2013 Sep; 30(17):1512-20. PubMed ID: 23534701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microscopic magnetic resonance elastography of traumatic brain injury model.
Boulet T; Kelso ML; Othman SF
J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Oct; 201(2):296-306. PubMed ID: 21871490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Viscoelastic characterization of injured brain tissue after controlled cortical impact (CCI) using a mouse model.
Qiu S; Jiang W; Alam MS; Chen S; Lai C; Wang T; Li X; Liu J; Gao M; Tang Y; Li X; Zeng J; Feng Y
J Neurosci Methods; 2020 Jan; 330():108463. PubMed ID: 31698000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency-dependent viscoelastic parameters of mouse brain tissue estimated by MR elastography.
Clayton EH; Garbow JR; Bayly PV
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(8):2391-406. PubMed ID: 21427486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR elastography in a murine stroke model reveals correlation of macroscopic viscoelastic properties of the brain with neuronal density.
Freimann FB; Müller S; Streitberger KJ; Guo J; Rot S; Ghori A; Vajkoczy P; Reiter R; Sack I; Braun J
NMR Biomed; 2013 Nov; 26(11):1534-9. PubMed ID: 23784982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Viscoelasticity of children and adolescent brains through MR elastography.
Ozkaya E; Fabris G; Macruz F; Suar ZM; Abderezaei J; Su B; Laksari K; Wu L; Camarillo DB; Pauly KB; Wintermark M; Kurt M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104229. PubMed ID: 33387852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of mild traumatic brain injury in rodent models using shear wave elastography: preliminary studies.
Xu ZS; Yao A; Chu SS; Paun MK; McClintic AM; Murphy SP; Mourad PD
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Oct; 33(10):1763-71. PubMed ID: 25253822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Magnetic resonance elastography 2.0: high resolution imaging of soft tissue elasticity, viscosity and pressure].
Sack I
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2013 Nov; 138(47):2426-30. PubMed ID: 23839480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance elastography methodology for the evaluation of tissue engineered construct growth.
Curtis ET; Zhang S; Khalilzad-Sharghi V; Boulet T; Othman SF
J Vis Exp; 2012 Feb; (60):. PubMed ID: 22349156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of in vivo and post-mortem mechanical behavior of brain tissue using magnetic resonance elastography.
Vappou J; Breton E; Choquet P; Willinger R; Constantinesco A
J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):2954-9. PubMed ID: 18805534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Viscoelastic properties of liver measured by oscillatory rheometry and multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography.
Klatt D; Friedrich C; Korth Y; Vogt R; Braun J; Sack I
Biorheology; 2010; 47(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 20683156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tissue structure and inflammatory processes shape viscoelastic properties of the mouse brain.
Millward JM; Guo J; Berndt D; Braun J; Sack I; Infante-Duarte C
NMR Biomed; 2015 Jul; 28(7):831-9. PubMed ID: 25963743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of the dynamic shear modulus of mouse brain tissue in vivo by magnetic resonance elastography.
Atay SM; Kroenke CD; Sabet A; Bayly PV
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021013. PubMed ID: 18412500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Viscoelastic properties of soft gels: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and dynamic shear testing in the shear wave regime.
Okamoto RJ; Clayton EH; Bayly PV
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6379-400. PubMed ID: 21908903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance elastography compared with rotational rheometry for in vitro brain tissue viscoelasticity measurement.
Vappou J; Breton E; Choquet P; Goetz C; Willinger R; Constantinesco A
MAGMA; 2007 Dec; 20(5-6):273-8. PubMed ID: 18080819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wideband MRE and static mechanical indentation of human liver specimen: sensitivity of viscoelastic constants to the alteration of tissue structure in hepatic fibrosis.
Reiter R; Freise C; Jöhrens K; Kamphues C; Seehofer D; Stockmann M; Somasundaram R; Asbach P; Braun J; Samani A; Sack I
J Biomech; 2014 May; 47(7):1665-74. PubMed ID: 24657103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of anisotropic mechanical properties in porcine brain white matter ex vivo using magnetic resonance elastography.
Schmidt JL; Tweten DJ; Badachhape AA; Reiter AJ; Okamoto RJ; Garbow JR; Bayly PV
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Mar; 79():30-37. PubMed ID: 29253729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical properties of porcine brain tissue in vivo and ex vivo estimated by MR elastography.
Guertler CA; Okamoto RJ; Schmidt JL; Badachhape AA; Johnson CL; Bayly PV
J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 69():10-18. PubMed ID: 29395225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tabletop magnetic resonance elastography for the measurement of viscoelastic parameters of small tissue samples.
Ipek-Ugay S; Drießle T; Ledwig M; Guo J; Hirsch S; Sack I; Braun J
J Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 251():13-8. PubMed ID: 25554945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR Elastography of the Breast: Evolution of Technique, Case Examples, and Future Directions.
Patel BK; Samreen N; Zhou Y; Chen J; Brandt K; Ehman R; Pepin K
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):e102-e111. PubMed ID: 32900617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
