These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23536749)
1. The dynamic range paradox: a central auditory model of intensity change detection. Simpson AJ; Reiss JD PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57497. PubMed ID: 23536749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intensity discrimination as the driving force for loudness. Application to pure tones in quiet. Hellman WS; Hellman RP J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1255-65. PubMed ID: 2324392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of increments and decrements in sinusoids as a function of frequency, increment, and decrement duration and pedestal duration. Moore BC; Peters RW; Kohlrausch A; van de Par S J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2954-65. PubMed ID: 9373982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A mathematical exploration of the mystery of loudness adaptation. Norwich KH Bull Math Biol; 2010 Feb; 72(2):298-313. PubMed ID: 19727963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intensity resolution and loudness in broadband noise. Schlauch RS; Harvey S; Lanthier N J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1895-902. PubMed ID: 7593914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Pulse Rate on Loudness Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users. Azadpour M; McKay CM; Svirsky MA J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Jun; 19(3):287-299. PubMed ID: 29532190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Continuous loudness response to acoustic intensity dynamics in melodies: effects of melodic contour, tempo, and tonality. Olsen KN; Stevens CJ; Dean RT; Bailes F Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():117-28. PubMed ID: 24809252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Loudness enhancement and intensity discrimination under forward and backward masking. Plack CJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):1024-30. PubMed ID: 8759955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones. Hellman R; Scharf B; Teghtsoonian M; Teghtsoonian R J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Aug; 82(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 3624649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neural coding of sound intensity and loudness in the human auditory system. Röhl M; Uppenkamp S J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 13(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 22354617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forward masking of dynamic acoustic intensity: effects of intensity region and end-level. Olsen KN; Stevens CJ Perception; 2012; 41(5):594-605. PubMed ID: 23025162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationships of intensity discrimination to sensation and loudness levels: dependence on sound frequency. Ozimek E; Zwislocki JJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3304-20. PubMed ID: 8914312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Unified Theory of Psychophysical Laws in Auditory Intensity Perception. Zeng FG Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1459. PubMed ID: 32670167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of individual loudness functions by trisection of loudness ranges. Villchur E; Killion MC Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 18769270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Further test of a model for loudness coding after adaptation. Mahon AE; Weiler EM Br J Audiol; 1980 Feb; 14(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 7362920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Duration of increment, magnitude estimation adaptation and a proposed loudness function. Weiler EM; Cobb F J Aud Res; 1982 Oct; 22(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 7188204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. fMRI activation in relation to sound intensity and loudness. Langers DR; van Dijk P; Schoenmaker ES; Backes WH Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(2):709-18. PubMed ID: 17254802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]