144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23537061)
1. Inter-observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion reserve quantification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 Tesla in comparison to quantitative coronary angiography.
Ikuye K; Buckert D; Schaaf L; Walcher T; Rottbauer W; Bernhardt P
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Mar; 15(1):25. PubMed ID: 23537061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements.
Ebersberger U; Makowski MR; Schoepf UJ; Platz U; Schmidtler F; Rose J; Kessel A; Roth P; Antoni D; Schnackenburg B; Helmberger T; Rieber J; Hoffmann E; Leber AW
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1174-80. PubMed ID: 23907345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fully automated pixel-wise quantitative CMR-myocardial perfusion with CMR-coronary angiography to detect hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Zhao SH; Guo WF; Yao ZF; Yang S; Yun H; Chen YY; Han TT; Zhou XY; Fu CX; Zeng MS; Li CG; Pan CZ; Jin H
Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7238-7249. PubMed ID: 37145148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-tesla.
Cheng AS; Pegg TJ; Karamitsos TD; Searle N; Jerosch-Herold M; Choudhury RP; Banning AP; Neubauer S; Robson MD; Selvanayagam JB
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jun; 49(25):2440-9. PubMed ID: 17599608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
Costa MA; Shoemaker S; Futamatsu H; Klassen C; Angiolillo DJ; Nguyen M; Siuciak A; Gilmore P; Zenni MM; Guzman L; Bass TA; Wilke N
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Aug; 50(6):514-22. PubMed ID: 17678734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.
Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic value of global myocardial perfusion reserve assessment based on coronary sinus flow measurements using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in addition to myocardial stress perfusion imaging.
Shomanova Z; Florian A; Bietenbeck M; Waltenberger J; Sechtem U; Yilmaz A
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 18(8):851-859. PubMed ID: 28369259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of dynamic 3-dimensional whole heart magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging against fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease.
Jogiya R; Kozerke S; Morton G; De Silva K; Redwood S; Perera D; Nagel E; Plein S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Aug; 60(8):756-65. PubMed ID: 22818072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multi-centre study of whole-heart dynamic 3D cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: gender based analysis of diagnostic performance.
Hamada S; Gotschy A; Wissmann L; Paetsch I; Jahnke C; Plein S; Gebker R; Oebel S; Alkadhi H; Marx N; Lüscher TF; Kozerke S; Manka R
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 18(10):1099-1106. PubMed ID: 28984890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Whole-heart dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: determination of volumetric myocardial ischaemic burden and coronary lesion location.
Manka R; Paetsch I; Kozerke S; Moccetti M; Hoffmann R; Schroeder J; Reith S; Schnackenburg B; Gaemperli O; Wissmann L; Wyss CA; Kaufmann PA; Corti R; Boesiger P; Marx N; Lüscher TF; Jahnke C
Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(16):2016-24. PubMed ID: 22677136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla: a comparison to fractional flow reserve.
Bernhardt P; Walcher T; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Dec; 28(8):2049-56. PubMed ID: 22476908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Mapping by CMR to Detect Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Validation Against Invasive Coronary Physiology.
Kotecha T; Martinez-Naharro A; Boldrini M; Knight D; Hawkins P; Kalra S; Patel D; Coghlan G; Moon J; Plein S; Lockie T; Rakhit R; Patel N; Xue H; Kellman P; Fontana M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 12(10):1958-1969. PubMed ID: 30772231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sub-segmental quantification of single (stress)-pass perfusion CMR improves the diagnostic accuracy for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease.
Le MTP; Zarinabad N; D'Angelo T; Mia I; Heinke R; Vogl TJ; Zeiher A; Nagel E; Puntmann VO
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Feb; 22(1):14. PubMed ID: 32028980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve.
Manka R; Wissmann L; Gebker R; Jogiya R; Motwani M; Frick M; Reinartz S; Schnackenburg B; Niemann M; Gotschy A; Kuhl C; Nagel E; Fleck E; Marx N; Luescher TF; Plein S; Kozerke S
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25901043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined Assessment of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Flow Measurement in the Coronary Sinus Improves Prediction of Functionally Significant Coronary Stenosis Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve in Multivessel Disease.
Nakamori S; Sakuma H; Dohi K; Ishida M; Tanigawa T; Yamada A; Takase S; Nakajima H; Sawai T; Masuda J; Nagata M; Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Fujii E; Yamada N; Ito M
J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Jan; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 29432130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Performance of Fully Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
Hsu LY; Jacobs M; Benovoy M; Ta AD; Conn HM; Winkler S; Greve AM; Chen MY; Shanbhag SM; Bandettini WP; Arai AE
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):697-707. PubMed ID: 29454767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of myocardial transmural perfusion gradient by magnetic resonance imaging to fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Pan J; Huang S; Lu Z; Li J; Wan Q; Zhang J; Gao C; Yang X; Wei M
Am J Cardiol; 2015 May; 115(10):1333-40. PubMed ID: 25796365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.
Morton G; Chiribiri A; Ishida M; Hussain ST; Schuster A; Indermuehle A; Perera D; Knuuti J; Baker S; Hedström E; Schleyer P; O'Doherty M; Barrington S; Nagel E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 60(16):1546-55. PubMed ID: 22999722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance vs SPECT Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease.
Arai AE; Schulz-Menger J; Shah DJ; Han Y; Bandettini WP; Abraham A; Woodard PK; Selvanayagam JB; Hamilton-Craig C; Tan RS; Carr J; Teo L; Kramer CM; Wintersperger BJ; Harisinghani MG; Flamm SD; Friedrich MG; Klem I; Raman SV; Haverstock D; Liu Z; Brueggenwerth G; Santiuste M; Berman DS; Pennell DJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 82(19):1828-1838. PubMed ID: 37914512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical feasibility of accelerated, high spatial resolution myocardial perfusion imaging.
Manka R; Vitanis V; Boesiger P; Flammer AJ; Plein S; Kozerke S
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul; 3(7):710-7. PubMed ID: 20633848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
