280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23537067)
1. Comparing potential early caries assessment methods for teledentistry.
Van Hilsen Z; Jones RS
BMC Oral Health; 2013 Mar; 13():16. PubMed ID: 23537067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth using swept source optical coherence tomography.
Nakajima Y; Shimada Y; Sadr A; Wada I; Miyashin M; Takagi Y; Tagami J; Sumi Y
J Biomed Opt; 2014 Jan; 19(1):16020. PubMed ID: 24474506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of early occlusal caries pre- and post-sealant application--an imaging approach.
Holtzman JS; Ballantine J; Fontana M; Wang A; Calantog A; Benavides E; Gonzalez-Cabezas C; Chen Z; Wilder-Smith P
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Aug; 46(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 24729412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) for the diagnosis of smooth surface caries in vitro.
Nakagawa H; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Tagami J; Sumi Y
J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 23084870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro performance of different methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions.
Gomez J; Zakian C; Salsone S; Pinto SC; Taylor A; Pretty IA; Ellwood R
J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 23146817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Ex vivo assessment of the potency of optical coherence tomography for the detection of early occlusal caries].
Xiao-Hua D; Hui Y; Xiaoli L; Yanni L; Yingying W; Xiaobin L; Lu X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Dec; 34(6):564-569. PubMed ID: 28318154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnosis of Occlusal Caries with Dynamic Slicing of 3D Optical Coherence Tomography Images.
Luong MN; Shimada Y; Araki K; Yoshiyama M; Tagami J; Sadr A
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 32192069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) for the diagnosis of occlusal caries.
Shimada Y; Sadr A; Burrow MF; Tagami J; Ozawa N; Sumi Y
J Dent; 2010 Aug; 38(8):655-65. PubMed ID: 20470855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of a fluorescence camera for detection of occlusal caries in vitro.
Jablonski-Momeni A; Schipper HM; Rosen SM; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Roggendorf MJ; Stoll R; Stachniss V; Pieper K
Odontology; 2011 Jan; 99(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 21271327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-destructive clinical assessment of occlusal caries lesions using near-IR imaging methods.
Staninec M; Douglas SM; Darling CL; Chan K; Kang H; Lee RC; Fried D
Lasers Surg Med; 2011 Dec; 43(10):951-9. PubMed ID: 22109697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of the loci of non-cavitated fissure caries on its detection with optical coherence tomography.
Zain E; Zakian CM; Chew HP
J Dent; 2018 Apr; 71():31-37. PubMed ID: 29378225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of the ICDAS system and two fluorescence-based intraoral devices for examination of occlusal surfaces.
Theocharopoulou A; Lagerweij MD; van Strijp AJ
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 25793954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of two quantitative analysis methods of optical coherence tomography for detection of enamel demineralization and comparison with microhardness.
Cara AC; Zezell DM; Ana PA; Maldonado EP; Freitas AZ
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Nov; 46(9):666-71. PubMed ID: 25164563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative in vitro validation of VistaProof and DIAGNOdent pen for occlusal caries detection in permanent teeth.
Seremidi K; Lagouvardos P; Kavvadia K
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):234-45. PubMed ID: 22166109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical performance of clinical-visual examination, digital bitewing radiography, laser fluorescence, and near-infrared light transillumination for detection of non-cavitated proximal enamel and dentin caries.
Kocak N; Cengiz-Yanardag E
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Sep; 35(7):1621-1628. PubMed ID: 32333336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging in vivo secondary caries and ex vivo dental biofilms using cross-polarization optical coherence tomography.
Lenton P; Rudney J; Chen R; Fok A; Aparicio C; Jones RS
Dent Mater; 2012 Jul; 28(7):792-800. PubMed ID: 22578989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. OCT assessment of non-cavitated occlusal carious lesions by variation of incidence angle of probe light and refractive index matching.
Park KJ; Haak R; Ziebolz D; Krause F; Schneider H
J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():31-35. PubMed ID: 28479506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of photographic and visual assessment of occlusal caries with histology as the reference standard.
Boye U; Walsh T; Pretty IA; Tickle M
BMC Oral Health; 2012 Apr; 12():10. PubMed ID: 22540771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination.
Ekstrand KR; Ricketts DN; Kidd EA
Caries Res; 1997; 31(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 9165195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions.
Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
