These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I. Deformation of restored teeth. Versluis A; Tantbirojn D; Lee MS; Tu LS; DeLong R Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 20970176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of a nanofilled resin-based coating on water absorption by teeth restored with glass ionomer. Hankins AD; Hatch RH; Benson JH; Blen BJ; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Apr; 145(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 24686970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cuspal flexure of composite-restored typodont teeth and correlation with polymerization shrinkage values. Enochs T; Hill AE; Worley CE; Veríssimo C; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):152-160. PubMed ID: 29061285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cuspal flexure, depth-of-cure, and bond integrity of bulk-fill composites. Do T; Church B; Veríssimo C; Hackmyer SP; Tantbirojn D; Simon JF; Versluis A Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(7):468-73. PubMed ID: 25514074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage. Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations--Part II. Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A; Ghosn C; Khraisat A Odontostomatol Trop; 2009 Jun; 32(126):29-37. PubMed ID: 20069964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of composite insertion technique on cuspal deflection using an in vitro simulation model. Jafarpour S; El-Badrawy W; Jazi HS; McComb D Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 22313278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cuspal Flexure and Extent of Cure of a Bulk-fill Flowable Base Composite. Francis AV; Braxton AD; Ahmad W; Tantbirojn D; Simon JF; Versluis A Oper Dent; 2015; 40(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 25741908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations. Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites. Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Nathwani H; Burke FJ; Randall RC Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):324-35. PubMed ID: 15766579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface? Van Ende A; De Munck J; Mine A; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 19906417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations. Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations. Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface. Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]