These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23537571)

  • 21. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration.
    Versluis A; Tantbirojn D; Pintado MR; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 15134943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Non-destructive examination of interfacial debonding using acoustic emission.
    Li H; Li J; Yun X; Liu X; Fok AS
    Dent Mater; 2011 Oct; 27(10):964-71. PubMed ID: 21752458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance.
    Allara FW; Diefenderfer KE; Molinaro JD
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15478480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gingival microleakage of Class II resin composite restorations with fiber inserts.
    El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Eltanty A; Abbasi K; Habib N
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 17555183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
    Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods.
    Kim ME; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 21827222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Filling cavities or restoring teeth?
    Versluis A; Versluis-Tantbirojn D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2011; 91(2):36-42; quiz 42-3. PubMed ID: 21748978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth.
    da Silva Telles PD; Aparecida M; Machado M; Nör JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 11572489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations.
    Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-term nanoleakage depth and pattern of cervical restorations bonded with different adhesives.
    Mobarak EH; Daifalla LE
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 21942238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cuspal Flexure and Stress in Restored Teeth Caused by Amalgam Expansion.
    Danley BT; Hamilton BN; Tantbirojn D; Goldstein RE; Versluis A
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):E300-E307. PubMed ID: 30457946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Role of delayed light polymerization of a dual-cured composite base on marginal adaptation of class II posterior composite open-sandwich restoration.
    Kamath U; Sheth H;
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):296. PubMed ID: 22945734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites.
    Kwon Y; Ferracane J; Lee IB
    Dent Mater; 2012 Jul; 28(7):801-9. PubMed ID: 22575738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of different composite restoration techniques on cuspal deflection: an in vitro study.
    González-López S; Lucena-Martín C; de Haro-Gasquet F; Vilchez-Díaz MA; de Haro-Muñoz C
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):656-60. PubMed ID: 15646221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
    Attar N; Korkmaz Y
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
    Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.