BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23538067)

  • 1. How bad was it? Differences in the time course of sensitivity to the magnitude of loss in problem gamblers and controls.
    Kreussel L; Hewig J; Kretschmer N; Hecht H; Coles MG; Miltner WH
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 247():140-5. PubMed ID: 23538067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Problem gamblers exhibit reward hypersensitivity in medial frontal cortex during gambling.
    Oberg SA; Christie GJ; Tata MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Nov; 49(13):3768-75. PubMed ID: 21982697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiological correlates of near outcome and outcome sequence processing in problem gamblers and controls.
    Ulrich N; Hewig J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):379-392. PubMed ID: 29111453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can event-related potentials serve as neural markers for wins, losses, and near-wins in a gambling task? A principal components analysis.
    Lole L; Gonsalvez CJ; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):390-8. PubMed ID: 23792216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An electrophysiological analysis of coaching in Blackjack.
    Hewig J; Trippe RH; Hecht H; Coles MG; Holroyd CB; Miltner WH
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1197-205. PubMed ID: 18761133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of age on the neural correlates of feedback processing in a naturalistic gambling game.
    West R; Tiernan BN; Kieffaber PD; Bailey K; Anderson S
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):734-45. PubMed ID: 24758702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Telling good from bad news: ADHD differentially affects processing of positive and negative feedback during guessing.
    van Meel CS; Oosterlaan J; Heslenfeld DJ; Sergeant JA
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(13):1946-54. PubMed ID: 15878183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reward and punishment hyposensitivity in problem gamblers: A study of event-related potentials using a principal components analysis.
    Lole L; Gonsalvez CJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 126(7):1295-309. PubMed ID: 25453608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hypersensitivity to reward in problem gamblers.
    Hewig J; Kretschmer N; Trippe RH; Hecht H; Coles MG; Holroyd CB; Miltner WH
    Biol Psychiatry; 2010 Apr; 67(8):781-3. PubMed ID: 20044073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Altered neural reward representations in pathological gamblers revealed by delay and probability discounting.
    Miedl SF; Peters J; Büchel C
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2012 Feb; 69(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 22310505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpersonal relationship modulates brain responses to outcome evaluation when gambling for/against others: an electrophysiological analysis.
    Leng Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():205-14. PubMed ID: 25218954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strategic and non-strategic problem gamblers differ on decision-making under risk and ambiguity.
    Lorains FK; Dowling NA; Enticott PG; Bradshaw JL; Trueblood JS; Stout JC
    Addiction; 2014 Jul; 109(7):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24450756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responsibility modulates neural mechanisms of outcome processing: an ERP study.
    Li P; Han C; Lei Y; Holroyd CB; Li H
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1129-33. PubMed ID: 21729102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asymmetrical effects of frequent gains and frequent losses in a gambling task.
    Nittono H; Otsuka Y; Ullsperger P
    Neuroreport; 2008 Aug; 19(13):1345-9. PubMed ID: 18695521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision making in pathological gambling: a comparison between pathological gamblers, alcohol dependents, persons with Tourette syndrome, and normal controls.
    Goudriaan AE; Oosterlaan J; de Beurs E; van den Brink W
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 23(1):137-51. PubMed ID: 15795140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feedback-related negativity reflects omission of monetary gains: Evidence from ERP gambling study.
    Yaple Z; Shestakova A; Klucharev V
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Nov; 686():145-149. PubMed ID: 30195974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imbalance in the sensitivity to different types of rewards in pathological gambling.
    Sescousse G; Barbalat G; Domenech P; Dreher JC
    Brain; 2013 Aug; 136(Pt 8):2527-38. PubMed ID: 23757765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision-Making, Cognitive Distortions and Alcohol Use in Adolescent Problem and Non-problem Gamblers: An Experimental Study.
    Ciccarelli M; Griffiths MD; Nigro G; Cosenza M
    J Gambl Stud; 2016 Dec; 32(4):1203-1213. PubMed ID: 26894884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feedback-related negativity is enhanced in adolescence during a gambling task with and without probabilistic reinforcement learning.
    Martínez-Velázquez ES; Ramos-Loyo J; González-Garrido AA; Sequeira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Jan; 26(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 25494471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of loss aversion on neural responses to loss outcomes: An event-related potential study.
    Kokmotou K; Cook S; Xie Y; Wright H; Soto V; Fallon N; Giesbrecht T; Pantelous A; Stancak A
    Biol Psychol; 2017 May; 126():30-40. PubMed ID: 28396213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.