470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23538180)
1. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.
Mittmann N; Au HJ; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Isogai PK; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Evans WK; Moore MJ; Siddiqui J; Findlay B; Colwell B; Simes J; Gibbs P; Links M; Tebbutt NC; Jonker DJ; ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1182-92. PubMed ID: 19666851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany.
Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Göke B; Kirchner T; Santas CC; Goldberg RM
Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):438-45. PubMed ID: 21898389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.
Tikhonova IA; Huxley N; Snowsill T; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Napier M; Hoyle M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):837-851. PubMed ID: 29498000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy.
Graham CN; Maglinte GA; Schwartzberg LS; Price TJ; Knox HN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Fakih MG
Clin Ther; 2016 Jun; 38(6):1376-1391. PubMed ID: 27085587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of KRAS testing and cetuximab as last-line therapy for colorectal cancer.
Shiroiwa T; Motoo Y; Tsutani K
Mol Diagn Ther; 2010 Dec; 14(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 21275455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-minimization analysis of the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Greece.
Fragoulakis V; Papagiannopoulou V; Kourlaba G; Maniadakis N; Fountzilas G
Clin Ther; 2012 Oct; 34(10):2132-42. PubMed ID: 23063374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial.
Seymour MT; Brown SR; Middleton G; Maughan T; Richman S; Gwyther S; Lowe C; Seligmann JF; Wadsley J; Maisey N; Chau I; Hill M; Dawson L; Falk S; O'Callaghan A; Benstead K; Chambers P; Oliver A; Marshall H; Napp V; Quirke P
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jul; 14(8):749-59. PubMed ID: 23725851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PTEN expression and KRAS mutations on primary tumors and metastases in the prediction of benefit from cetuximab plus irinotecan for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Loupakis F; Pollina L; Stasi I; Ruzzo A; Scartozzi M; Santini D; Masi G; Graziano F; Cremolini C; Rulli E; Canestrari E; Funel N; Schiavon G; Petrini I; Magnani M; Tonini G; Campani D; Floriani I; Cascinu S; Falcone A
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jun; 27(16):2622-9. PubMed ID: 19398573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of targeted therapy with cetuximab in patients with K-ras wild-type colorectal cancer presenting with initially unresectable metastases limited to the liver in a German setting.
Asseburg C; Frank M; Köhne CH; Hartmann JT; Griebsch I; Mohr A; Osowski U; Schulten J; Mittendorf T
Clin Ther; 2011 Apr; 33(4):482-97. PubMed ID: 21635994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cetuximab plus irinotecan after irinotecan failure in elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients: clinical outcome according to KRAS and BRAF mutational status.
Fornaro L; Baldi GG; Masi G; Allegrini G; Loupakis F; Vasile E; Cupini S; Stasi I; Salvatore L; Cremolini C; Vincenzi B; Santini D; Tonini G; Graziano F; Ruzzo A; Canestrari E; Magnani M; Falcone A
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 20619672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of KRAS mutations in predicting the efficacy of cetuximab-plus-irinotecan therapy in irinotecan-refractory Korean metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Sohn BS; Kim TW; Lee JL; Ryu MH; Chang HM; Kang YK; Park HS; Na YS; Jang SJ; Kim JC; Lee JS
Oncology; 2009; 77(3-4):224-30. PubMed ID: 19738388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Fc{gamma}RIIa-Fc{gamma}RIIIa polymorphisms and KRAS mutations on the clinical outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab plus irinotecan.
Bibeau F; Lopez-Crapez E; Di Fiore F; Thezenas S; Ychou M; Blanchard F; Lamy A; Penault-Llorca F; Frébourg T; Michel P; Sabourin JC; Boissière-Michot F
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 27(7):1122-9. PubMed ID: 19164213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Panitumumab in patients with KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer after progression on cetuximab.
Wadlow RC; Hezel AF; Abrams TA; Blaszkowsky LS; Fuchs CS; Kulke MH; Kwak EL; Meyerhardt JA; Ryan DP; Szymonifka J; Wolpin BM; Zhu AX; Clark JW
Oncologist; 2012; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 22210091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Analysis of the correlation with KRAS gene mutation status and the benefit of cetuximab plus irinotecan as third- line chemotherapy for the Treatment of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer].
Asai H; Shinozaki E; Nozaki A; Watanabe T; Suenaga M; Matuzaka S; Chin K; Mizunuma N; Yasukawa M; Hatake K
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1285-91. PubMed ID: 21829065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
