These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23538240)

  • 1. Optimal frequency of shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Li K; Lin T; Zhang C; Fan X; Xu K; Bi L; Han J; Huang H; Liu H; Dong W; Duan Y; Yu M; Huang J
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1260-7. PubMed ID: 23538240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of High, Intermediate, and Low Frequency Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Urinary Tract Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
    Kang DH; Cho KS; Ham WS; Lee H; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158661. PubMed ID: 27387279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Delivery Rates Achieves Excellent Outcomes for Ureteral Stones: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Nguyen DP; Hnilicka S; Kiss B; Seiler R; Thalmann GN; Roth B
    J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):418-23. PubMed ID: 25661296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The efficiency of urolithiasis treatment with extracorporeal lithotripsy in relation to the shock waves frequency.
    Azat Ch; Pacik D; Varga G; Hajny M
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2010; 111(12):644-6. PubMed ID: 21384732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective randomized study.
    Yilmaz E; Batislam E; Basar M; Tuglu D; Mert C; Basar H
    Urology; 2005 Dec; 66(6):1160-4. PubMed ID: 16360432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does rate matter? The results of a randomized controlled trial of 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi.
    Davenport K; Minervini A; Keoghane S; Parkin J; Keeley FX; Timoney AG
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2055-8; discussion 2058. PubMed ID: 17070254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Slow vs rapid delivery rate shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric renal urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.
    Salem HK; Fathy H; Elfayoumy H; Aly H; Ghonium A; Mohsen MA; Hegazy Ael R
    J Urol; 2014 May; 191(5):1370-4. PubMed ID: 24262496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies: A systematic review update.
    Elmansy HE; Lingeman JE
    Int J Surg; 2016 Dec; 36(Pt D):676-680. PubMed ID: 27890653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal shock wave rate for shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a prospective randomized study.
    Moon KB; Lim GS; Hwang JS; Lim CH; Lee JW; Son JH; Jang SH
    Korean J Urol; 2012 Nov; 53(11):790-4. PubMed ID: 23185672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial.
    Pace KT; Ghiculete D; Harju M; Honey RJ;
    J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):595-9. PubMed ID: 16006908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.
    Madbouly K; El-Tiraifi AM; Seida M; El-Faqih SR; Atassi R; Talic RF
    J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 15592053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lu P; Wang Z; Song R; Wang X; Qi K; Dai Q; Zhang W; Gu M
    Urolithiasis; 2015 Jun; 43(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 25721456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimizing the fragmentation and clearance after shock wave lithotripsy.
    Kekre NS; Kumar S
    Curr Opin Urol; 2008 Mar; 18(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 18303545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Efficacy and Safety of Tamsulosin Combined with Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Chen K; Mi H; Xu G; Liu L; Sun X; Wang S; Meng Q; Lv T
    J Endourol; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1166-76. PubMed ID: 25915454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is effective in treating single melamine induced urolithiasis in infants and young children.
    Jia J; Shen X; Wang L; Zhang T; Xu M; Fang X; Xu G; Qian C; Wu Y; Geng H
    J Urol; 2013 Apr; 189(4):1498-502. PubMed ID: 23201375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis.
    Semins MJ; Trock BJ; Matlaga BR
    J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):194-7; discussion 197. PubMed ID: 18001796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized, double-blind trial to compare shock wave frequencies of 60 and 120 shocks per minute for upper ureteral stones.
    Honey RJ; Schuler TD; Ghiculete D; Pace KT;
    J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1418-23. PubMed ID: 19683303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shen P; Jiang M; Yang J; Li X; Li Y; Wei W; Dai Y; Zeng H; Wang J
    J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1328-35. PubMed ID: 21855945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective, randomized study of the clinical effects of shock wave delivery for unilateral kidney stones: 60 versus 120 shocks per minute.
    Ng CF; Lo AK; Lee KW; Wong KT; Chung WY; Gohel D
    J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):837-42. PubMed ID: 22819406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review.
    Drake T; Grivas N; Dabestani S; Knoll T; Lam T; Maclennan S; Petrik A; Skolarikos A; Straub M; Tuerk C; Yuan CY; Sarica K
    Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):772-786. PubMed ID: 28456350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.