124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2353846)
1. Correlation of computerized semen analysis with successful fertilization of oocytes in an in vitro fertilization program.
Check JH; Bollendorf A; Lee MA; Nazari A; Nowroozi K
Arch Androl; 1990; 24(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 2353846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between sperm motility assessed with the Hamilton-Thorn motility analyzer and fertilization rates in vitro.
Liu DY; Clarke GN; Baker HW
J Androl; 1991; 12(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 1917688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sperm morphology evaluated by computer (IVOS) cannot predict the fertilization rate in vitro after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Sukcharoen N; Sithipravej T; Promviengchai S; Chinpilas V; Boonkasemsanti W
Fertil Steril; 1998 Mar; 69(3):564-8. PubMed ID: 9531900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Male factor as determinant of in-vitro fertilization outcome.
Enginsu ME; Pieters MH; Dumoulin JC; Evers JL; Geraedts JP
Hum Reprod; 1992 Sep; 7(8):1136-40. PubMed ID: 1400938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with borderline semen: a randomized study using sibling oocytes.
van der Westerlaken L; Naaktgeboren N; Verburg H; Dieben S; Helmerhorst FM
Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 16595217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does computerized image analysis of sperm movement enhance the predictive value of semen analysis for in-vitro fertilization results?
Grunert JH; de Geyter C; Bordt J; Schneider HP; Nieschlag E
Int J Androl; 1989 Oct; 12(5):329-38. PubMed ID: 2592121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human sperm movement assessed with the Hamilton-Thorn motility analyzer and in vitro fertilization.
Mak C; van Kooij RJ; Eimers JM; te Velde ER
Andrologia; 1994; 26(6):323-9. PubMed ID: 7872506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examination of data from programs of in vitro fertilization in relation to sperm integrity and reproductive success.
Rogers BJ
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 302():69-89; discussion 90-3. PubMed ID: 2666992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a cut-off value for normal sperm morphology using strict criteria to predict fertilization after conventional in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in asthenozoospermia.
Zollner U; Schleyer M; Steck T
Hum Reprod; 1996 Oct; 11(10):2155-61. PubMed ID: 8943521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of sperm parameters, in vitro fertilization results, and subsequent pregnancy rates using sequential ejaculates, collected two hours apart, from oligoasthenozoospermic men.
Barash A; Lurie S; Weissman A; Insler V
Fertil Steril; 1995 Nov; 64(5):1008-11. PubMed ID: 7589619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationships between sperm motility characteristics assessed by the computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) and fertilization rates in vitro.
Hirano Y; Shibahara H; Obara H; Suzuki T; Takamizawa S; Yamaguchi C; Tsunoda H; Sato I
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2001 Apr; 18(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 11432113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of male infertility by in vitro fertilization: factors affecting fertilization and pregnancy.
Cohen J; Edwards RG; Fehilly CB; Fishel SB; Hewitt J; Rowland G; Steptoe PC; Webster J
Acta Eur Fertil; 1984; 15(6):455-65. PubMed ID: 6536138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimal requirements for ejaculates used for in vitro fertilization.
Riedel HH; Baukloh V; Mettler L
Arch Androl; 1984; 12(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 6476968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between in vitro fertilization and human sperm density and motility.
Gerris J; Khan I
J Androl; 1987; 8(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 3558110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Delayed fertilization and poor embryonic development associated with impaired semen quality.
Ron-el R; Nachum H; Herman A; Golan A; Caspi E; Soffer Y
Fertil Steril; 1991 Feb; 55(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 1991532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The importance of computer-assisted semen analysis and sperm function testing in an IVF program.
Joshi N; Kodwany G; Balaiah D; Parikh M; Parikh F
Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1996; 41(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8673156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is leukocytospermia clinically relevant?
Yanushpolsky EH; Politch JA; Hill JA; Anderson DJ
Fertil Steril; 1996 Nov; 66(5):822-5. PubMed ID: 8893692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4-7 days of ejaculation abstinence.
Alipour H; Van Der Horst G; Christiansen OB; Dardmeh F; Jørgensen N; Nielsen HI; Hnida C
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1364-1372. PubMed ID: 28531319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Poor in vitro fertilization outcome with semen yielding low sperm density "swim-ups" is not because of altered sperm motion parameters.
Thanki KH; Gagliardi CL; Schmidt CL
Fertil Steril; 1992 Oct; 58(4):770-5. PubMed ID: 1426324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphology of seminal and swim-up spermatozoa and the outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
Rosenborg L; Gustafson O; Lunell NO; Nylund L; Pousette A; Slotte H; Akerlöf E; Fredricsson B
Andrologia; 1990; 22(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 2264633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
