These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23538628)
1. Intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann, noncontact, Schiøtz, and dynamic contour tonometry after DSEK. Yi K; Bae G; Kong M; Chung ES Cornea; 2013 Aug; 32(8):1089-93. PubMed ID: 23538628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann tonometer, I-care pro, Tonopen XL, and Schiotz tonometer in patients after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Ohana O; Varssano D; Shemesh G Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 65(7):579-583. PubMed ID: 28724814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry. Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers. Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties. Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes. Papastergiou GI; Kozobolis V; Siganos DS J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):484-8. PubMed ID: 18794685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the Pascal dynamic contour, Canon TX-10 non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in healthy subjects. Pelit A; Altan-Yaycioglu R; Pelit A; Akova YA Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Jan; 92(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 18637107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children. Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of the rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in routine clinical practice. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Jimenez-Santos M; Saenz-Frances F; Matilla-Rodero M; Mendez-Hernandez C; Herrero-Vanrell R; Garcia-Feijoo J Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 19900196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers. Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]