283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23538888)
1. In vitro high-resolution flat-panel computed tomographic arthrography for artificial cartilage defect detection: comparison with multidetector computed tomography.
Guggenberger R; Winklhofer S; Spiczak JV; Andreisek G; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):614-21. PubMed ID: 23538888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flat-panel CT arthrography: feasibility study and comparison to multidetector CT arthrography.
Guggenberger R; Fischer MA; Hodler J; Pfammatter T; Andreisek G
Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 22488509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. C-arm flat-panel CT arthrography of the wrist and elbow: first experiences in human cadavers.
Guggenberger R; Morsbach F; Alkadhi H; Vich M; Pfammatter T; Hodler J; Andreisek G
Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Mar; 42(3):419-29. PubMed ID: 22926680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of radiation dose and image quality between flat panel computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in a hybrid CT-angiography suite.
Jones AK; Odisio BC
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):121-127. PubMed ID: 31922349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metallic artifacts from internal scaphoid fracture fixation screws: comparison between C-arm flat-panel, cone-beam, and multidetector computed tomography.
Finkenstaedt T; Morsbach F; Calcagni M; Vich M; Pfirrmann CW; Alkadhi H; Runge VM; Andreisek G; Guggenberger R
Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):532-9. PubMed ID: 24691141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. C-arm flat-panel CT arthrography of the shoulder: Radiation dose considerations and preliminary data on diagnostic performance.
Guggenberger R; Ulbrich EJ; Dietrich TJ; Scholz R; Kaelin P; Köhler C; Elsässer T; Le Corroller T; Pfammatter T; Alkadhi H; Andreisek G
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):454-463. PubMed ID: 27221562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the image quality of a mobile flat-panel computed tomography and a multidetector computed tomography: a phantom study.
Neubauer J; Voigt JM; Lang H; Scheuer C; Goerke SM; Langer M; Fiebich M; Kotter E
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):491-7. PubMed ID: 24637586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of flat-panel CT arthrography for cartilage defect detection in the ankle joint: comparison with MDCT arthrography with gross anatomy as the reference standard.
Chemouni D; Champsaur P; Guenoun D; Desrousseaux J; Pauly V; Le Corroller T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):1069-74. PubMed ID: 25341147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flat-panel CT arthrography for cartilage defect detection in the ankle joint: first results in vivo.
Pagliano S; Chemouni D; Guggenberger R; Pauly V; Guenoun D; Champsaur P; Le Corroller T
Skeletal Radiol; 2020 Aug; 49(8):1259-1265. PubMed ID: 32146486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-resolution flat panel CT versus 3-T MR arthrography of the wrist: initial results in vivo.
Sonnow L; Koennecker S; Luketina R; Werncke T; Hinrichs JB; Meyer BC; Wacker FK; von Falck C
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jun; 29(6):3233-3240. PubMed ID: 30552480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultra-high resolution C-Arm CT arthrography of the wrist: Radiation dose and image quality compared to conventional multidetector computed tomography.
Werncke T; Sonnow L; Meyer BC; Lüpke M; Hinrichs J; Wacker FK; von Falck C
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():191-199. PubMed ID: 28267538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High resolution flat-panel CT arthrography vs. MR arthrography of artificially created osteochondral defects in ex vivo upper ankle joints.
Pöhler GH; Sonnow L; Ettinger S; Rahn A; Klimes F; Becher C; von Falck C; Wacker FK; Plaass C
PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0255616. PubMed ID: 34375344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MDCT arthrography of the hip: value of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique and potential for radiation dose reduction.
Tobalem F; Dugert E; Verdun FR; Dunet V; Ott JG; Rudiger HA; Cherix S; Meuli R; Becce F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):W665-73. PubMed ID: 25415733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors.
Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Bakhtiar B; Richard S; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3506-20. PubMed ID: 15651634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image quality of flat-panel computed tomography using 2 different acquisition times versus multidetector computed tomography in whole-head temporal bone specimen.
Reimann K; Hirt B; Schulze M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 277(2):415-422. PubMed ID: 31758306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the potential utility of flat panel CT for quantifying relative contrast enhancement.
Jones AK; Mahvash A
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4149-54. PubMed ID: 22830748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Multidetector Computed Tomography and Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Regarding Visualization of Cortical Fractures, Cortical Defects, and Orthopedic Screws: A Phantom Study.
Neubauer J; Benndorf M; Lang H; Lampert F; Kemna L; Konstantinidis L; Neubauer C; Reising K; Zajonc H; Kotter E; Langer M; Goerke SM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Aug; 94(31):e1231. PubMed ID: 26252281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flat panel CT versus multidetector CT in skull base imaging: are there differences in image quality?
Schulze M; Hirt B; Reimann K
Head Face Med; 2023 Nov; 19(1):50. PubMed ID: 37980498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of flat-panel-detector-based CT and multidetector-row CT in automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules using an anthropomorphic chest phantom.
Marten K; Dullin C; Machann W; Schmid JS; DAS M; Hermann KP; Engelke C
Br J Radiol; 2009 Aug; 82(981):716-23. PubMed ID: 19332516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calcium score of small coronary calcifications on multidetector computed tomography: results from a static phantom study.
Groen JM; Kofoed KF; Zacho M; Vliegenthart R; Willems TP; Greuter MJ
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):e58-63. PubMed ID: 23092538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
